ZE09032401 - 2009-03-24
Permalink: http://www.zenit.org/article-25463?l=english


Blessings at Holy Communion


And More on Safekeeping of the Eucharist

ROME, MARCH 24, 2009 
(<http://www.zenit.org>Zenit.org).- Answered by 
Legionary of Christ Father Edward McNamara, 
professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum university.

Q: In America, the custom of giving blessings to 
people who are unable to receive Communion is 
growing rapidly. In my parish, in Texas, it 
appears that the practice of extraordinary 
ministers of holy Communion tracing a cross onto 
the head of small children and visitors has 
become more important than the Eucharist itself. 
Many have commented to me that it is so 
"unwelcoming" not to do this. I have pointed out 
in liturgy meetings that neither the Rite of 
Blessings nor the Roman Missal envisions this 
practice. As a deacon I am greatly bothered by 
this trend, but my "parish administrator" is 
hesitant to change the habit of the previous 
pastor. In fact, at weddings and funerals this 
behavior is encouraged for non-Catholics by our 
presiding priests. I would greatly appreciate 
reading or hearing your opinion/suggestions on 
what appears to be an insert into the Eucharistic 
rite and perhaps a disservice to our ability to 
create a true desire and understanding for 
receiving Christ at Mass in holy Communion. -- D.I., Texas

A: We have addressed this topic on a couple of 
occasions (May 
<http://www.zenit.org/article-12979?l=english>10 
and 
<http://www.zenit.org/article-13108?l=english>24, 
2005) in which we expressed misgivings regarding 
this practice. At the same time, we pointed out 
that the legal situation of the usage is murky 
with bishops making statements falling on both sides of the argument.

Recently, however, a document has appeared in 
several Internet sources which indicate that the 
Holy See is tending toward a negative view of the 
practice. The document is a letter (Protocol No. 
930/08/L) dated Nov. 22, 2008, sent in response 
to a private query and signed by Father Anthony 
Ward, SM, undersecretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship.

As a private reply the letter is not yet a norm 
with legal force and, as it makes clear, is not a 
definitive reply. However, it provides some 
valuable pointers on the legitimacy of this 
practice and the mind of the Holy See regarding it.

The letter said that "this matter is presently 
under the attentive study of the Congregation," 
so "for the present, this dicastery wishes to 
limit itself to the following observations":

"1. The liturgical blessing of the Holy Mass is 
properly given to each and to all at the 
conclusion of the Mass, just a few moments 
subsequent to the distribution of Holy Communion.

"2. Lay people, within the context of Holy Mass, 
are unable to confer blessings. These blessings, 
rather, are the competence of the priest (cf. 
Ecclesia de Mysterio, Notitiae 34 (15 Aug. 1997), 
art. 6, § 2; Canon 1169, § 2; and Roman Ritual De 
Benedictionibus (1985), n. 18).

"3. Furthermore, the laying on of a hand or hands 
-- which has its own sacramental significance, 
inappropriate here -- by those distributing Holy 
Communion, in substitution for its reception, is to be explicitly discouraged.

"4. The Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris 
Consortio n. 84, 'forbids any pastor, for 
whatever reason or pretext even of a pastoral 
nature, to perform ceremonies of any kind for 
divorced people who remarry'. To be feared is 
that any form of blessing in substitution for 
communion would give the impression that the 
divorced and remarried have been returned, in 
some sense, to the status of Catholics in good standing.

"5. In a similar way, for others who are not to 
be admitted to Holy Communion in accord with the 
norm of law, the Church's discipline has already 
made clear that they should not approach Holy 
Communion nor receive a blessing. This would 
include non-Catholics and those envisaged in can. 
915 (i.e., those under the penalty of 
excommunication or interdict, and others who 
obstinately persist in manifest grave sin)."

Although the letter as such is not legally 
binding, some of its points, such as No. 2 on the 
prohibition of lay ministers giving liturgical 
blessings, are merely restatements of existing 
law and as such are already obligatory.

Nor did the letter deal with all possible 
circumstances, such as the case of small children 
mentioned by our reader. Because of this, some 
dioceses have taken a prudent wait-and-see 
attitude regarding these blessings. For example, 
the liturgy office of the Archdiocese of Atlanta, 
while reiterating that "the Archdiocese has no 
policy prohibiting the use of blessings at the 
time of Holy Communion," prudently suggested to 
pastors that it "may be appropriate to avoid 
promoting the practice until a more definitive 
judgment regarding its value in the liturgical celebration can be obtained."

* * *

Follow-up: Eucharist in Sacristy Safe

In the wake of our 
<http://web.zenit.org/article-25322?l=english>March 
10 comments on the importance of the altar of 
repose, a priest from Arizona wrote: "Thank you 
for clarifying what is meant by the rubrics for 
Holy Thursday. The only challenge is that since 
no hosts are consecrated on Good Friday we need 
to reserve a very large amount to accommodate the 
faithful who participate in the Liturgy of the 
Lord's Passion. Most repositories, and even 
tabernacles, are too small to reserve the Blessed 
Sacrament. Also, most repositories are portable 
and not secured as the tabernacle is required to 
be. Hence, the sacristy closet. What say you?"

Another reader asked: "At the end of the Holy 
Thursday service there is a procession of the 
Blessed Sacrament. Up until a few years ago the 
procession ended at the tabernacle in our church. 
Our worship committee and liturgical director 
decided to build a resting place or shrine (for 
lack of a better description) for the Blessed 
Sacrament. This is located in the middle of the 
gym floor in our grade school next door. So now 
our procession goes through the church and then 
outside and over to the gym. My question: Is this 
liturgically correct? We have a perfectly good 
church and a tabernacle. I have a problem (as do 
others) with Jesus being left at center court. 
Not to mention the complaints I've received from 
people who have no way to kneel because of the hard gym floor."

Taking both questions together, I would suggest 
that most of these difficulties can be resolved 
over time and with careful planning. Since these 
difficulties will return every year, a parish 
could invest in a suitably sized portable 
tabernacle and large sacred vessels. In some 
cases, such as the Good Friday celebration, it is 
also an opportunity to reuse the large ciboria 
that were common before the present (and 
commendable) preference for administrating hosts 
consecrated at the same Mass. These large ciboria 
may still be held in storage somewhere.

It might also be an opportunity to purchase and 
restore to sacred use the liturgical appointments 
such as tabernacles and large candlesticks that come from closed-down churches.

Since the Holy Thursday procession represents the 
movement from the Lord's Supper to Gethsemane, 
the place for reservation should not be in the 
habitual tabernacle unless the church has a 
separate Blessed Sacrament chapel. It may be a 
side altar or some other place within the church 
or another suitable location nearby. It should be 
as beautiful as possible and decorated with 
flowers, lamps and candles. Many places also 
include portable olive trees and wheat sheaves to 
create a suitable ambience for prayer and 
reflection. It is also common to avoid excessive 
electric lighting and to drape the space around 
the tabernacle with carpet and fine cloth.

Therefore, it is not against liturgical law to 
set up the altar in the school gymnasium, 
provided that the place is decorated in a manner 
worthy of the Blessed Sacrament. It is important 
that at least some pews or kneelers be provided 
so as to allow for adoration. If the altar of 
repose is in the same church, then only the 
ministers and a representative of the faithful 
need take part in the procession while the others remain in their pews.

Because of its temporary status, and the fact 
that the Eucharist is usually accompanied almost 
all the time, the altar of repose need not be 
secured like other tabernacles. As mentioned last 
time, if there is a real danger of theft, then 
the Eucharist may be temporarily withdrawn after adoration.

What if so many people attend the Good Friday 
services that far more hosts are required than 
can be reserved in the altar of repose? In that 
case, it is possible to reserve just one large 
ciborium in the altar-of-repose tabernacle and 
reserve the others in a suitable place that 
should remain locked until the moment of 
communion. In this way, all adoration would 
center around the altar of repose. If the other 
place is the sacristy, then strict silence should be observed out of respect.

After communion on Good Friday the remaining 
hosts may only be used for the sick or, on Holy 
Saturday, as viaticum. These are not returned to 
the altar of repose but are placed in some other 
suitable and worthy place that remains locked. 
For example, if the church has a Blessed 
Sacrament chapel, then the hosts could be placed 
there but the chapel should be curtained and 
inaccessible until after the Easter Vigil Mass. 
It could also be some other space in the sacristy 
that can be suitably cordoned off.

After the Good Friday service a temporary altar 
of repose is usually dismantled and stored away. 
The flowers which customarily adorn it may be used for the Easter Vigil.

 From the point of view of the sign, it is best 
not to use the hosts consecrated on Holy Thursday 
until Easter Monday so that as far as possible 
the faithful may receive hosts consecrated at the Easter Masses.

* * *

Readers may send questions to [email protected]. 
Please put the word "Liturgy" in the subject 
field. The text should include your initials, 
your city and your state, province or country. 
Father McNamara can only answer a small selection 
of the great number of questions that arrive.

<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Custom Faith-based U.S. Postage <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic 
on Amazon <*}}}>< <*}}}>< 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on 
AllPosters today <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><
+
"A person is a person, no matter how small." Dr. Seuss


<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Custom Faith-based U.S. Postage <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic 
on Amazon <*}}}>< <*}}}>< 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on 
AllPosters today <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><
+
"A person is a person, no matter how small." Dr. Seuss

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to