Female Genital Mutilation on British Turf
http://www.aina.org/news/2009032008902.htm

----------
Posted GMT 3-20-2009 13:9:2

----------
Latest 
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5913979.ece>reports
 
indicate that approximately 500 girls a year have 
their genitals mutilated in Britain.

It may come as no surprise to the knowledgeable 
political and cultural observer that the poor 
victims of these crimes are not from Christian or 
Jewish families, nor from Hindu or Buddhist ones. 
They are to be found predominantly in Muslim 
households. And being Muslim is a status that 
gives the victims, and all future victims, the 
unfortunate distinction of being part of a group 
that society can’t help, because the lib-Left has 
made sure that the Muslim culture can never be 
criticized and, therefore, that its sufferers can never be protected or saved.

Fact: female circumcision is illegal in Britain. 
But this doesn't mean that British law 
enforcement is doing anything about this crime 
that Muslim communities are perpetrating against their little girls.

The reality: five hundred girls’ genitals are 
mutilated every year in Britain. Not one arrest. Not one incarceration.

You think protecting little girls’ genitals is 
more important nowadays than protecting oneself 
from the charge of being Islamophobic? Think again.

Islamic women haters, therefore, are reigning 
free in Britain. Enraged at even the thought of 
female sexuality, the self-appointed guardians of 
Islamic purity make sure to obliterate the 
clitorises of little girls before the girls begin 
to get the concept of their own human agency and 
the magic of love. In a fascistic effort to deny 
women even the possibility of personal happiness, 
individuality and sexual satisfaction, these 
mutilators start cutting girls at the age of 
seven or eight­before their menstrual periods 
begin­so that their sexuality will be amputated forever.

Despite its gruesome terror, this crime is widely 
practised throughout world, for it is a crucial 
ingredient of Islamic gender apartheid and is 
known as female genital mutilation (FGM). Its 
ideological premise has been carefully 
constructed: a girl’s genital area is dirty and 
unacceptable. How much is amputated varies among 
cultures. In Egypt only the clitoris is 
amputated; in countries like Sudan the 
woman-haters are not so kind. In a savagery 
called infibulation, the girl’s external genital 
organs are completely removed: the clitoris, the 
two major outer lips (labia majora) and the two 
minor inner lips (labia minora). In Sudan, the 
term used for this is tahur­which means “cleansing” or “purification.”

More than 130 million women living today have 
been subjected to this horrifying practice, and 
more than two million girls are assaulted by it 
each year. That is more than five thousand girls 
every day. Many girls lose their lives during 
FGM, which is often done with broken glass. Most 
victims suffer from chronic infection and pain 
for the rest of their lives. The mutilation robs 
women of their ability to enjoy the fullness of 
their sexuality and, therefore, the fullness of 
their lives. Approximately 75 percent of women 
cannot achieve orgasm without clitoral 
stimulation; thus, the possibility of sexual 
satisfaction has been obliterated for millions of women in the Muslim world.

The Muslim communities who practise FGM will not 
easily abandon their barbarity. The Egyptian 
government, for example, banned FGM in 1996, but 
an Egyptian court overturned the ban in July 
1997. The problem is that the clitoris mutilators 
point to traditional teachings that sanction FGM. 
Islamic tradition, for instance, records the 
Prophet Muhammad emphasizing that circumcising 
girls is “a preservation of honor for women.” A 
legal manual of the Shafi'i school of Islamic 
jurisprudence, 'Umdat al-Salik, which is endorsed 
by Al-Azhar University of Cairo -- the oldest and 
most prestigious university in the Islamic world 
-- states that circumcision is obligatory for both boys and girls.

Underlying this brutality is the obvious belief 
that the sexual mutilation of women will help 
keep the structure of Islamic gender apartheid in 
place. Keeping FGM legitimized and 
institutionalized is one of the most effective 
means to keep women subjugated and caged. The 
assumption is that amputating the clitoris will 
kill the woman’s sexual desire and thereby reduce 
the chances that she will ever toy with the notion of self-determination.

Thanks to the Left’s policy of multiculturalism, 
where no value can be said to be worse or better 
than any other (except, of course, if American 
society and culture is the subject of 
discussion), FGM is now being widely practised on 
Western territory. 
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5913979.ece>A 
study estimates that 66,000 women living in 
England and Wales have suffered FGM, most of them 
before emigrating from their home country. More 
than 7,000 girls in Britain alone, meanwhile, are 
at a high risk of being victims of the crime. At 
present, we know that 
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5913979.ece>more 
than 500 girls in Britain are being mutilated every year.

This horror show demands a certain question: 
Where are the leftist feminists in the West 
crying out in opposition to this crime against 
their sisters being carried out on their own 
shores? In what pages, in what demonstrations, 
are they denouncing the theology that serves as 
an inspiration to this crime and calling it to 
account? Where are the Women’s Studies 
Departments on Western campuses demanding that 
Islam be confronted on these grotesque elements 
of misogyny? Where are the columnists of the 
Nation Magazine, the supposed leader of the 
humanitarian Left, repudiating this practise and the texts on which is based?

The Left’s cries of indignation are not to be 
heard because admitting the inferiority of an 
adversarial culture might very well legitimize 
Western civilization, a recognition that no 
leftist can allow if he hopes to retain his 
identity and social belonging. That’s why the 
leftist forces in our society do their best to 
excuse FGM with the tired old mantra: it’s not 
only Muslims that do it – as if inaction to save 
human beings from evil is somehow justified 
because a sin might exist somewhere else.

Hypothetical question: if we could have saved the 
Jewish inmates from Auschwitz before they were 
gassed, would it have been right to abort the 
rescue operation upon discovering that someone, 
somewhere, in some other place, said or did something anti-Semitic?

Yes, there are non-Islamic parts of Africa whose 
cultural traditions also dehumanize women and 
practice FGM. But Muslims are the principal 
religious group that practices this sexual 
violence against women. In Egypt, 97 percent of 
girls are circumcised. And there is no greater 
revolting image than the smug leftist turning his 
back on these victims because a non-Muslim 
somewhere sliced the genitals off of a little 
girl. How does this self-satisfied inhumanity 
save the Muslim girls who will be mutilated in the future?

We know that it doesn’t. But alas, this is only 
another chapter of a long dark story – the story 
of the Left, with its hands drenched with 
complicity in human blood, sacrificing human 
beings on the altar of utopian ideals.

[Editors' note: Jamie Glazov's new book, 
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=B41AF907-0F8F-4527-9A68-4A9AFEAF656A>United
 
in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and 
Terror, provides an analysis of the Left's 
silence about Islamic gender apartheid. To order 
a copy, 
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/1935071602/ref=dp_proddesc_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books>click
 
here.]

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com

Jamie Glazov is Frontpage Magazine's editor. He 
holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in 
Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is 
the author of 
<http://www.amazon.com/Canadian-Khrushchevs-Security-Strategic-Studies/dp/0773522751>Canadian
 
Policy Toward Khrushchev’s Soviet Union and is 
the co-editor (with David Horowitz) of 
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=6317>The 
Hate America Left. He edited and wrote the 
introduction to David Horowitz’s 
<https://www.donationreport.com/init/controller/ProcessEntryCmd?key=D8Q0U3W0R8>Left
 
Illusions. His new book is 
<http://www.amazon.com/United-Hate-Romance-Tyranny-Terror/dp/1935071076/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234935656&sr=1-1>United
 
in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and 
Terror. To see his previous symposiums, 
interviews and articles 
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.asp?ID=3>Click 
Here. Email him at <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected].


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to