Friday May 8, 2009



Canon Law Prof Confronts DC Archbishop Wuerl on Refusal to Deny 
Communion to Pro-Abortion Politicians

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09050809.html

By Kathleen Gilbert

DETROIT, Michigan, May 8, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - American canon 
lawyer Edward Peters has challenged the reasoning behind Washington 
D.C. Archbishop Donald Wuerl's recent assertion that he would not 
deny Communion to the heavily pro-abortion House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

In an interview with Politics Daily published Wednesday, Archbishop 
Wuerl said he would not deny Pelosi Communion, which was equated with 
using the sacrament as a "weapon", and maintained that "there's a 
question about whether this canon [915] was ever intended to be 
used'' in such a manner.

"I stand with the great majority of American bishops and bishops 
around the world in saying this canon was never intended to be used 
this way.'' said Wuerl.

Canon 915 states: "Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or 
interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately 
persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to holy communion."

Commenting on Wuerl's position in his blog "In the Light of the Law," 
Peters, a professor of canon law at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary 
in Detroit,  said he thought the archbishop's claims were based on a 
misunderstanding of the purpose of canon law.

"No canon in the Code was written with the intention of bringing 
politicians to heel. That's a disingenuous way to frame this issue," 
wrote Peters.

As canon law is "designed to advance the salvific mission of the 
Church", said Peters: "To hold, therefore, that any canon is intended 
to bring a particular secular grouping of people 'to heel' is to 
misunderstand what canon law is for."

"The mistake is compounded," he said, "when one goes on to use that 
mischaracterization of canon law to avoid the correct application of canon law.

"If Wuerl wants to argue that Pelosi has not acted in a way as to 
make herself liable to consequences under Canon 915, he's free to 
make his case. (I think he'd lose that argument, but he's free to make it.)

"But he cannot gratuitously assert that Canon 915 was never 
'intended' to apply to the Pelosis of this world and leave the matter 
thus," Peters affirmed.  "Canon 915 unquestionably applies to all 
Roman Catholics regardless of their civil status or secular profession."

In lieu of Speaker Pelosi ceasing her abortion advocacy or 
voluntarily refraining from Communion, Peters said, "I see no choice 
for Abp. Wuerl but to order enforcement of Canon 915 against her."

However, the canon lawyer noted: "nothing gives the forces of 
darkness greater pleasure than to see those committed following 
Christ at serious odds with one another.

"Such disputes must, in a fallen world, arise, but we should strive 
to resolve them correctly as quickly as possible and, once settled, 
to go on more united than ever toward the next struggle," wrote Peters.

See previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Archbishop Wuerl Refuses to Deny Communion to Pro-Abortion Speaker Pelosi
<http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09050613.html>http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09050613.html


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to