[]


Food Matters


- Marion Nestle

Archive | <http://www.sfgate.com/rss/feeds/foodmatters.xml>
RSS



'Certified Organic' may not be 100%

<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/21/FDRJ187G2S.DTL>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/21/FDRJ187G2S.DTL
 

Marion Nestle

Sunday, June 21, 2009

----------
Nutrition and public policy expert Marion Nestle 
answers readers' questions in this column written 
exclusively for The Chronicle. E-mail your 
questions to 
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected], 
with "Marion Nestle" in the subject line.

----------


Images

[]


[]
 View Larger Image

----------


Food Matters

    * 'Certified Organic' may not be 100% 06.21.09
    * Gluten intolerance becoming more commonplace 05.31.09
    * Dietary supplements' regulations hard to digest 05.10.09
    * Full plate for Obama's new FDA administrator 04.12.09
More Food Matters ยป

----------
In the year since I have been writing this 
column, readers have sent in many questions about 
organic foods. With the White House and the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture planting organic 
gardens, these questions have become more urgent.

Q: What is the difference between "100% organic" and "organic"?

A: Organic has a precise meaning under the USDA's 
organic program. Certified 100% Organic means 
that all the ingredients in a product have been 
grown or raised according to the USDA's organic 
standards, which are the rules for producing 
foods labeled organic. Certified Organic requires 
that 95 to 99 percent of the ingredients follow the rules.

What, exactly, are those rules? Summarizing 
what's in hundreds of pages in the Federal Register:

-- Plants cannot be grown with synthetic 
pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, genetic 
modification, irradiation or sewage sludge.

-- Animals must be raised exclusively on organic 
feed, have access to the outdoors, and cannot be 
given antimicrobial drugs or hormones.

-- Producers will be inspected to make sure these 
practices are being followed to the letter.

Q: How do we know "organic" truly reflects our beliefs?

A: I am guessing this question refers to the 
spirit of organics. In the 1920s, the British 
botanist Albert Howard learned from observing 
farmers in India that human health depends on 
growing foods sustainably. Indian farmers taught 
him the importance of protecting soil nutrients 
through composted manure, crop rotation and 
appropriate cultivation, and using biological 
pest controls. Later, these methods were called "organic."

But USDA organic rules do not say a word about 
sustainability. This gap occurred as a result of 
the history of the organic standards (as I 
recount in "What to Eat"), but also as a result 
of the USDA's inherent conflicts of interest. The 
USDA's main job is to promote industrial 
agriculture. Organics, the USDA says, are just 
different, not better. Alas, the USDA has not 
always been a loving home for the organic program.

Q: Do food companies use the word "organic" in the same way they use "health"?

A: USDA organic rules are about the letter of the 
law, not its spirit. Food marketers, however, 
take advantage of public perceptions that 
"organic" implies spirit - sustainability and 
better nutrition. Companies that follow the rules 
can legitimately market highly processed foods as 
organic, taking advantage of their health aura to command higher prices.

No wonder so many big food companies have bought 
organic product lines (see 
<http://links.sfgate.com/ZHKJ%29.Yes>links.sfgate.com/ZHKJ).Yes, 
organic junk food is free of synthetic 
pesticides, but the foods still have calories. As 
I like to put it, an organic junk food is still a junk food.

Q: Which is worse: eating nonorganic produce full 
of pesticides or not eating produce at all?

A: Research demonstrates substantial health 
benefits from eating fruits and vegetables. 
Although I wish we had more definitive research, 
these benefits appear to greatly outweigh any risks of pesticides.

If you want to compromise, you can save your 
organic dollars for the foods most likely to be 
high in pesticides. These, according to the 
Environmental Working Group (ewg.org), are 
peaches, nectarines, apples, bell peppers, 
strawberries, cherries, pears, raspberries, 
imported grapes, celery, potatoes and spinach.

In contrast, foods that you peel - onions, peas, 
bananas, sweet corn and tropical fruits, for 
example - tend to be low in pesticides.

Q: Is organic food nutritionally worth its higher cost?

A: Foods grown on sustainable soils ought to 
contain higher levels of nutrients - and some 
studies show that they do - but organic 
certification does not require higher nutritional 
values. Without testing, I'd be hard-pressed to 
know whether the organic foods I'm buying really 
are nutritionally better. The main point of 
organics is production methods, and these require 
hand labor and careful management, both of which come at a higher cost.

If you believe, as I do, that growing foods 
according to organic practices is better for the 
environment, then paying more is worth it if you can afford to.

Q: Aren't organics elitist? People can't buy 
organic foods if they aren't available at an affordable price.

A: I once heard Eric Schlosser answer a similar 
question aimed at his book, "Fast Food Nation." 
He pointed out that social movements have to 
begin somewhere and that several began with 
elites but ended up helping the poor and 
disenfranchised - the civil rights, environmental 
and women's movements, for example.

I would add the organic movement to this list. It 
has already forced mainstream food producers to 
start cutting down on pesticides and to raise 
farm animals more humanely. As the supply of 
organic foods increases, and the Wal-Marts of the 
world sell more of them, organics should become more democratic.

But please don't blame organic producers for the 
high prices. Until the latest farm bill, which 
has a small provision for promotion of organic 
agriculture, organic farmers received not one 
break from the federal government. In contrast, 
the producers of corn, soybeans, wheat and cotton 
continue to get $20 billion or so a year in farm subsidies.

Industrial agriculture also benefits from 
federally administered marketing programs and 
from cozy relationships with congressional 
committees and the USDA. In contrast, the USDA 
considers fruits and vegetables "specialty 
crops." This kind of food politics shows up as 
higher prices in the grocery store.

Dealing with the elitism implied by the higher 
cost of organics means doing something about 
income inequities. If we want elected 
representatives to care more about public health 
than corporate health, let's work to remove the 
corruption from election campaign contributions. 
If Congress were less beholden to corporations, 
we might be able to create a system that paid 
farmers and farm workers decently and sold 
organic foods at prices that everyone could afford.

The organic gardens at the White House and USDA 
send an important signal that the way we grow 
food makes a difference. Let's hope they also 
symbolize a new era in agricultural policies, one 
that unites the letter and spirit of the organic movement.

Marion Nestle is the author of "Food Politics," 
"Safe Food" and "What to Eat," and is a professor 
in the department of nutrition, food studies and 
public health at New York University. E-mail her 
at 
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
and read her previous columns at sfgate.com/food.

This article appeared on page E - 3 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Yes, it's real postage!
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>
A Wedding to Always Remember

+
<*}}}>< 
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>A 
Wedding to Always 
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>Remember <*}}}><


Yes, it's real postage!
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>
A Wedding to Always Remember

+
<*}}}>< 
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>A 
Wedding to Always 
<http://holypostage.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=46>Remember <*}}}><

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to