Ok. This is looking as simple as reversing my changes in the original issue (http://objectstyle.org/jira/browse/CAY-305) and allowing the default behavior to prefix the table with a schema name.
Shall I assume that the user will manually create the schema in HSQLDB? I'm guessing that's what we do for Oracle. One thing I do notice is that the AUTO_PK_SUPPORT table is created in the default (PUBLIC for HSQLDB) schema, but I guess there's no reasonable default one could assume short of creating multiple AUTO_PK_SUPPORT TABLEs, one for each schema. Also, I'm considering using "HSQLDBNoSchemaAdapter extends HSQLDBAdapter" as the old behavior. I don't really like the name HSQLDBAdapter17. Opinions?
