> > > I'm with Cris on this. +1 for migrating all history into apache SVN. > +1 for a "repackaging" release of cayenne with a minimal amount of > code changes. I think doing this right after the 1.2 release makes a > great deal of sense. I'd recommend calling it 2.0 rather than "apache > 1.2" though since it's no longer backwards compatible. >
We have a 2.0 roadmap, so it might be confusing. Hmm... we could always start the versioning over at Apache Cayenne 1.0, but that might be even more confusing! Agree on not calling it "1.2 apache" though. Cris
