I might suggest that second-level caching should probably be seperated and very easily pluggable. Plugging in arbitrary implementations is fairly important in most significant apps I have worked with which were able to use O/RM and a second level cache.

-Brian


On Apr 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:

I've not looked at JCS, but I was thinking just the other day that I'd
like to be able to more finely tune the caching -- heavily cache entity
A, but lightly cache entity B.  Or set different times-to-live in the
cache for different entities.  Haven't had time to look into what is
involved (among other things) in order to do that, though.

/dev/mrg


-----Original Message-----
From: Tore Halset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: jcs - something for cayenne?


Hello.

I was at a java user group meeting today. A guy talked about jcs and
it looked great. I have not used it before, but perhaps it can be
used in cayenne as an alternative to the commons LRUMap? Anyone here
used jcs for anything?

http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/

What I would like to have in cayenne is the option to have less
caching on some of the tables.

  - Tore.

Reply via email to