I keep reading that as "NeXTstep", but Steve Jobs has wired up my brain differently.
+1 to an RC2. /dev/mrg -----Original Message----- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Next Step? I am leaning towards doing an RC2 before the final. We have 12 issues marked as fixed since RC1 (mostly minor and/or specific to ROP, but still). How about an RC2 this Friday (right before ApacheCon)? I am feeling fairly certain about it being the last RC before final. Also I branched the main code [1] to be able to check in some new features I need for work. We'll merge them back to 3.0 when we are done with 1.2 and 2.0 (have to remember to do that before we rename the packages). Andrus [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/branches/ PROTO-3.0/cayenne/ On Jun 11, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I guess we can decide on RC2 vs. final closer to the release date, > dependning on whether any new major bugs are discovered in the next > week > or so (there were hints at concurrency issues of the shared cache > that I > want to investigate). > > Also I wanted to give heads up on the docs work I am doing now. > Instead of > the three current tutorials (that look more like examples), I am > writing a > step by step guide showing how to map a DB schema, write a command > line > app (demonstrating Cayenne API) and turn it to a web app > (demonstrating > deployment tricks, rather than Struts or Tapestry). Once this is > done, I > want to extend this tutorial with ROP chapter(s) (something like > "take an > existing mapping, turn it to a web service, write a Java client"). > > This (and general docs update) are the last tasks on my list. > > [1] http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/Tutorial+Scratchpad > > Andrus > > >> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:22:33 -0400, Cris Daniluk >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'll probably have the docs finished for tomorrow. There's still >>> some >>> more stuff I want to do for javadoc linking, but that's not worth >>> holding up 1.2 for. >> >> Cool. If you want me to go through and update the Modeler docs, >> let me >> know. >> >>> The only other reason I could see waiting is to make some sample >>> apps >>> for the various new features. Last I checked, there wasn't a >>> solid ROP >>> demo. >> >> I'm not sure if a mini-app was planned for release, but one of the >> SoC >> projects is an ROP demo. >> >> -- >> Kevin >> >> > >
