I agree with Andrus on separating these out. I really would like to get the WO compatibility layer separated.
Just my .02 Garry On 6/23/06 9:42 AM, "Andrus Adamchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > >> The presence of an external contrib lib could be argued for, but >> what I'm aiming to do is cut down on the amount of time to tie in >> with whatever other frameworks. I also want something that is >> fairly well supported and maintained. > > I think the core of the issue is "supported and maintained" and not > the "same jar vs. a separate jar". We have these examples of > technologies that are somewhat tangential to Cayenne: > > * Spring integration is not maintained cause nobody cares to maintain > it. > * WebObjects integration is fairly well maintained. > * DataViews is abandoned (inside Cayenne) > > At the source level I would actually separate each integration piece > in its own Maven module (if only to have a clear separation of third- > party dependencies for the build build), and defer a decision of how > we assemble the release till we actually have those pieces written. > > Andrus > -- Garry Watkins Database Administrator Motley Rice LLC 843-216-9639 Confidential & Privileged Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the information contained in this communication is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product. This communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or otherwise--which you may have of this communication.
