Is the DataView design compatible with the JPA direction of Cayenne, i.e. will the *.map.xml file become obsolete?
regards Malcolm On 10/9/06, Malcolm Edgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes CAY-400 would be very useful, especially if we can take it down to a field level. Examples could include: * database table and field comments * field metadata, e.g. minvalue="5", label="Customer No." I will take this up dicussion further on the JIRA regards Malcolm On 10/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually if all you need is to attach arbitrary properties to the > mapping objects, I suggest that we work on this Jira issue: > > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-400 > > adding this functionality to the Modeler itself. It is fairly > straightforward and is long overdue - it was promised to the users > quite some time ago. > > Andrus > > > On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > Hi Malcolm, > > > > DVModeler is available up to and including 2.0.x release. > > > > We removed it from the trunk recently, because there are no > > volunteers to support it, and it hasn't been updated for many years > > now, becoming a liability. We can always resurrect it if somebody > > steps in and dedicates enough time to this piece of technology. > > > > Andrus > > > > > > On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I wanted to enquire about the status of the Cayenne DataView > >> modeller. > >> > >> The reason being we are looking at defining related UI metadata for > >> applications. > >> > >> regards Malcolm Edgar > >> > > > > > >
