Bill Dudney wrote: > I think we are ripe, we've not heard anything from Jean so I think we > should move the discussion to the ppmc.
It looks like all the work items are done at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html . So I agree. > Once we get agreement there we can bring it back here and vote and then > go to the incubator. Since the DB PMC is sponsoring Cayenne, I suggest first checking in with them. To be honest, I'm not sure of the procedure at this point. No doubt there are precedents in [email protected] that could be dug up. -jean > Thoughts? > > TTFN, > > -bd- > > On Oct 5, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> I just updated our incubator status page, and we are looking really >> good: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html >> >> Here is a short summary of our incubation progress: >> >> * we came in to the incubator this March as an open source project >> with strong existing meritocracy procedures and extensive code base >> * we migrated 100% of the infrastructure to Apache >> * we collected all CLA's (and rewrote those few pieces of code where >> we couldn't find the authors) >> * and finally we made a 2.0.1 release that sailed smoothly through >> the approval process >> >> Looks like Apache Cayenne is ripe for graduation. I think the >> original intent to graduate as an Apache Top Level Project (TLP) is >> still the best thing to do. >> >> Thoughts on how do we proceed with graduation? >> >> Andrus > >
