No, 3.0 won't be released in that time frame. And "setPersistenceState" is a solution that works.

Andrus

On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Watkins, Garry wrote:

I need to use the 2.0+ series of code unless 3.0 will be ready for primetime
in the next 2 months.

Thanks
--
Garry Watkins

Database Administrator
Motley Rice LLC
843-216-9639



From: Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:08:12 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Is there an awakeFromInsertion equivalent in cayenne?

but I believe Andrus mentioned
there'd be other ways of doing it in 3.0

Yes - and this seems to be the killer feature in 3.0 - it's been
discussed like a dozen times in the past month. Here is a few links:

http://cwiki.apache.org/CAYDOC/lifecycle-callbacks.html
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2006/10/0112.html

Andrus


On Oct 30, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

setPersistenceState is what I use, too, but I believe Andrus mentioned there'd be other ways of doing it in 3.0 and I believe there were some ROP issues with it, too. If you aren't using ROP, you should be fine.

/dev/mrg


On 10/30/06, Bryan Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not directly.  When we converted our old WebObjects apps, we made a
custom superclass that hooks setPersistenceState():

    /**
     *  When any of our objects is inserted, call a method
     *  awakeFromInsertion() to allow the object class to do
initialization.
     */
    public void setPersistenceState(int state)
    {
        super.setPersistenceState(state);

        if (state == PersistenceState.NEW) {
            awakeFromInsertion();
        }
    }

    /**
     *  The default behavior for awakeFromInsertion() is to do
nothing.
     */
    public void awakeFromInsertion()
    {
    }





Watkins, Garry wrote:
I need to set up some default values.  Is there an equivalent to
awakeFromInsertion (WebObjects) for Cayenne?

Thanks










Confidential & Privileged

Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from its nature, the information contained in this communication is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product. This communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies--electronic, paper or otherwise--which you may have of this communication.





Reply via email to