It appears you're not using licenseurl in ccPublisher.  (at least in
the new developer release)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ccPublisher-1.9.x86/ccpublisher$ find . -name "*.py"
-exec grep licenseurl {} \; -print
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ccPublisher-1.9.x86/ccpublisher$

it looks like you're using <license> for both the _meta.xml and
_files.xml.  In the case of _meta.xml you have the license url, which
I would expect to be in <licenseurl>

-Tim

On 10/17/05, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So two things.  First, you *have* to specify the license URL in the
> <licenseurl> element, otherwise IA won't display the license
> correctly.  The fact that we populate the <license> element is really
> just an artifact of the way ccPublisher handles metadata.  That said,
> we have settled on the text there as the de facto standard for
> embedded license declarations, so if you populate it, that'd be
> cool.  Two points about that text:
>
> 1) The "verify at ..." is optional (this just needs to be taken into
> account when parsing); you can't make any validity claims without
> this portion, but we don't require it (since it requires an external
> metadata file).
> 2) The url following verify at is the location of the verification
> RDF, not the license.  So you have [date] [holder] Licensed to the
> public under [license_uri].  Verify at [verify_uri].
>
> Nathan
>
> On Oct 17, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Tim Olsen wrote:
>
> > Hi Nathan,
> >
> > The Advanced Contribution page says to use <licenseurl> to specify a
> > license url.  I noticed, however, you use <license> to specify a
> > license url in the _meta.xml file, and in the _files.xml you use
> > <license> to specify the whole license claim ( [date] [holder]
> > Licensed to the public under bla bla.  verify at [license url]) for
> > each file.
> >
> > I'm guessing that regardless of what the Advanced Contribution page
> > says, your way will become the de-facto standard as they are pushing
> > the ccPublisher.
> >
> > should I just follow what you're doing?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > On 10/10/05, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tim,
> >>
> >> I saw your earlier email (not sure if you or the Archive forwarded
> >> it to
> >> me), but completely spaced out replying.  Mea culpa.
> >>
> >> ccPublisher originally used the Advanced Contribution interface from
> >> IA.  The interface is documented at
> >> http://www.archive.org/help/contrib-advanced.php.  It involves
> >> uploading
> >> the files and metadata to IA and then polling a URI to start the
> >> import
> >> process.  The latest release of ccPublisher (and last few releases of
> >> Ourmedia Publisher) all use the new Direct Contribution interface,
> >> which
> >> reduces the delay between when an item is uploaded and when it is
> >> available on the site.  The Direct Contribution interface is
> >> documented
> >> at http://www.archive.org/help/contrib-direct.php.
> >>
> >> ccPublisher abstracts it's Archive.org functionality into the
> >> PyArchive
> >> module, in CVS at
> >> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/cctools/pyarchive/
> >> pyarchive/.  In
> >> particular submission.py contains our wrappers for the contribution
> >> interfaces.  If I recall correctly, CVS HEAD is still the old-style
> >> interface, and the ccp8_1_0_x branch has the new DC interface.
> >>
> >> I'd be happy to help you with any naggling details or questions
> >> you have.
> >>
> >> Nathan R. Yergler
> >> Software Engineer
> >> Creative Commons
> >>
> >> Tim Olsen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> My coworkers and I are adding to LimeWire the ability to upload
> >>> CC-licensed files to the Internet Archive.  I noticed ccPublisher
> >>> has
> >>> this ability.  Does anyone know of a published API for
> >>> interfacing to
> >>> the Internet Archive?
> >>>
> >>> I've tried asking this on the Internet Archive discuss list
> >>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), but haven't received a response
> >>> yet.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Tim
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cc-devel mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

Reply via email to