For example, there are two rdf blocks in the response. Is one for backward compatibility? How do you recommend using the response, e.g. if embedding the rdf in the page, should one or both of the rdf blocks be used?
Example from response document: ... <rdf><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"; xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ " xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# ">
<Work rdf:about="">
<license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
"/>
</Work>
<License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
us/">
<permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/
ns#Reproduction"/>
<permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/
ns#Distribution"/>
<requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice"/>
<requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/
ns#Attribution"/>
<permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks
"/>
</License>
</rdf:RDF>
</rdf>
<licenserdf>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"; xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
">
<License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/";><permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ ns#Reproduction"/> <permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ ns#Distribution"/>
<requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice"/>
<requires rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/
ns#Attribution"/>
<permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks
"/>
</License> </rdf:RDF> </licenserdf> Wendy Bossons Web Developer Contact Information: [email protected] 617-253-0770
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
