The HTML for the 4.0 licenses as published doesn't validate correctly. While it should currently display as intended for all browsers we're aware of, we are planning to correct the files so that they do validate--which requires that we make a change to the published files.
It is a best practice that the HTML validates, for many reasons, many of which are given here: http://validator.w3.org/docs/why.html We think it is important that everyone reading the legal code sees it correctly, now and in the future, as small things like section numbering and formatting can be significant. A few months ago we set out a policy for what is and isn't legal code: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Legal_code We believe this falls under the category of things that are not considered legal code. However, this type of change isn't mentioned specifically in the policy, and so we will be adding it to the list as "HTML and other coding that does not change the user's view of legal code elements". (We will also note the change to the files as a footnote on the errata page.) If you're currently producing a translation starting from the version of 4.0 as published, we recommend that you check your completed files against the corrected version when it is available, as we will be requiring that the files validate before publication. -Kat -- Kat Walsh, Counsel, Creative Commons IM/IRC/@/etc: mindspillage * phone: please email first Help us support the commons: https://creativecommons.net/donate/ California Registered In-House Counsel #801759 CC does not and cannot give legal advice. If you need legal advice, please consult your attorney. _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
