A copy from the original message:

Compare:

the RDFa of http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (using 
http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcreativecommons.org%2Flicenses%2Fby%2F4.0%2F&format=turtle&rdfagraph=output&vocab_expansion=false&rdfa_lite=false&embedded_rdf=true&space_preserve=true&vocab_cache=true&vocab_cache_report=false&vocab_cache_refresh=false)
to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/rdf 

The latter has a cc:requires cc:Notice which is missing in the former.

The consequence of this is that machine readers could get confused because 
there are contradicting sources. Also software based on this standard could 
produce wrong information.

To fix this problem we propose to move the the rdfa of cc:Attribution and add a 
cc:Notice RDFa tag. We’ve created a pull request that details this change here: 
https://github.com/creativecommons/creativecommons.org/pull/18

Cheers,

Maarten
-- 
Kennisland  | www.kennisland.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra

On 17 Apr 2014 at 18:05:50 , Matt Lee ([email protected]) wrote:

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Maarten Zeinstra <[email protected]> wrote:  

> @Matt is this on your radar?  

The patch seems reasonable. Care to give me the elevator pitch on why  
we're doing this? :)  
_______________________________________________  
cc-devel mailing list  
[email protected]  
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel  
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

Reply via email to