Thanks Mike, I see your point, the working group will publish a white paper about the topic within the next following days. I will post a link to it here so you can see what we envision.
Cheers, Maarten -- Kennisland | www.kl.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra > On 13 Mar 2015, at 4:20 , Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03/12/2015 08:31 AM, Maarten Zeinstra wrote: >> So you would actually advise not using the CC:License term in this case? > > Assuming this case is something like deciding the range of edm:rights > then yes I would advise using dcterms:RightsStatement rather than > cc:License. Your schema would be more accurate if less precise. It would > unquestionably allow objects that aren't licenses but instead are public > domain or other copyright status determinations, even objects which > themselves have a license property, much like the ODRS example you > linked to. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
