On 2011-04-02 08:10, devsk wrote: > Basically, when gcc is invoked specifically for preprocessing, ccache should > not > increment its "unsupported" counter. Its unnecessarily creating confusion by > showing thousands of files as "unsupported compiler option", when it really > is > not supposed to be doing anything for it.
I agree that having a separate statistics counter for the preprocessor case makes sense. I'll implement it. -- Joel _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache