On 2011-04-02 08:10, devsk wrote:
> Basically, when gcc is invoked specifically for preprocessing, ccache should 
> not 
> increment its "unsupported" counter. Its unnecessarily creating confusion by 
> showing thousands of files as "unsupported compiler option", when it really 
> is 
> not supposed to be doing anything for it.

I agree that having a separate statistics counter for the preprocessor
case makes sense. I'll implement it.

-- Joel
_______________________________________________
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache

Reply via email to