On 16 August 2012 14:54, Max Horn <m...@quendi.de> wrote:
> On 19.07.2012, at 23:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > Max, do you have a suggestion on which options would make sense to not
> > pass to the preprocessor?
> Naively, any preprocessor option would be suspect, I guess. Based on the 
> clang manpage, that would include at least these:
> [...]

Thanks for the investigation! Are you (or someone else) interested in
mocking up a patch for stripping those arguments from the preprocessor

-- Joel
ccache mailing list

Reply via email to