Hi,

I'm not opposed to introducing such an option. What would be a good name?
CCACHE_READONLY_DIRECT (readonly_direct in the config file on master)?

-- Joel


On 10 September 2014 09:57, Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> On 10/09/14 08:24, vkr wrote:
>
>> Why is that? I mean, when drop preprocessing only when an env variable is
>> set,
>> why is it not the right approach?
>>
>
> The development sources on the master branch has all-new option and
> environment variable processing code.
>
> The part where you act on the option is probably in the right place, but
> it ought to be read elsewhere. I'm not sure how that worked in 3.1.9.
>
>
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> ccache mailing list
> ccache@lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
>
_______________________________________________
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache

Reply via email to