Hi, I'm not opposed to introducing such an option. What would be a good name? CCACHE_READONLY_DIRECT (readonly_direct in the config file on master)?
-- Joel On 10 September 2014 09:57, Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 10/09/14 08:24, vkr wrote: > >> Why is that? I mean, when drop preprocessing only when an env variable is >> set, >> why is it not the right approach? >> > > The development sources on the master branch has all-new option and > environment variable processing code. > > The part where you act on the option is probably in the right place, but > it ought to be read elsewhere. I'm not sure how that worked in 3.1.9. > > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > ccache mailing list > email@example.com > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache > _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache