Hi, On 12 January 2016 at 10:35, vkr <venkatakrishnarao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering why it was necessary to use the realpath while rewriting > the path to relative, instead of the given path as-is? i.e When the check > for `x_realpath' on a given path passes, why not just use the given path to > rewrite it to relative? I don't remember the details, but passing the canonicalized path to get_relative_path was part of a bug fix related to CCACHE_BASEDIR. See this mail thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/ccache%40lists.samba.org/msg00802.html -- Joel _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
