On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 02:05:07PM +1030, Paul 'Rusty' Russell wrote:
> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
> > Currently, _info files can specify options, or note expected failures, for
> > ccanlint checks in the _info file with specially structured comments. That
> > differs from most other things ccanlint gets from _info, where it instead
> > executes the info file with certain parameters.
> >
> > This changes ccanlint and existing _info files to use the normal method for
> > the ccanlint test options as well.  This also has the advantage that an
> > info file can alter its test options based on things from config.h - in
> > some cases whether a test can work or not might depend on various things.
> 
> Agreed, please apply!

Done.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ccan mailing list
ccan@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/ccan

Reply via email to