Good luck Brian....Let me know how RTP is. I have my first lab attempt as well in 18 days ;)
John Spaulding Network Engineer, CCNP ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Question about topology (Bryan Bartik) 2. Re: Question about topology (prakash patel) 3. Dynamips Error (Rodney Jackson) 4. Re: Question about topology (Antonio Dee) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:43:44 -0600 From: Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> Cc: ccie_rs <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Robert, Good luck! You have been pretty active on here for awhile now so I know how hard you have been working. Just relax and let it all come to you. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]>wrote: > All > > I take my first attempt at the lab tomorrow morning at RTP. > > Wish me luck. I'll let you know how it goes when I get the results. > > Cheers. > ------------------------------ > > * From: *Bryan Bartik [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/01/2009 08:19 PM CST > * To: *Carlos Valero <[email protected]> > * Cc: *[email protected] > > * Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology > > I have 3640's that support dot1q on Ethernet sub-interfaces. As far as I > know, it was 2500s that did not support it. I didn't know 2600s had the same > issue... > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello Joe, >> >> Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB >> Routers? >> >> Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q on the Ethernet interfaces >> on these Routers. >> >> But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an >> Ethernet interface. >> I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. >> >> Could you please let me know? >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> --- On *Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]>* wrote: >> >> >> From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> To: "'Terry Vinson'" <[email protected]>, >> [email protected] >> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM >> >> >> Hey Terry, >> >> Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said. I would >> have >> to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where >> you >> HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. >> >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino >> CCIE #24347 (R&S) >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> [mailto:[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>] >> On Behalf Of Terry Vinson >> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM >> To: >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's >> and 2 3560's. I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 >> 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite >> sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed). My question is where >> should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities? I >> have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, >> but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. >> >> Thanks, >> Terry >> >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 >> 05:53:00 >> >> >> > > > -- > Bryan Bartik > CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090701/2d28de52/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:58:55 -0400 From: prakash patel <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hello Bob, Good luck! You can do it! From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:25:58 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology All I take my first attempt at the lab tomorrow morning at RTP. Wish me luck. I'll let you know how it goes when I get the results. Cheers. From: Bryan Bartik [[email protected]] Sent: 07/01/2009 08:19 PM CST To: Carlos Valero <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology I have 3640's that support dot1q on Ethernet sub-interfaces. As far as I know, it was 2500s that did not support it. I didn't know 2600s had the same issue... On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Joe, Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB Routers? Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q on the Ethernet interfaces on these Routers. But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an Ethernet interface. I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. Could you please let me know? Thank you! --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: "'Terry Vinson'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM Hey Terry, Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said. I would have to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where you HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Vinson Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology Hi Guys, I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's and 2 3560's. I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed). My question is where should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities? I have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. Thanks, Terry Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail? has ever-growing storage! Don?t worry about storage limits. http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090701/35de32d9/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:36:11 -0500 From: Rodney Jackson <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Dynamips Error To: OSL CCIE Routing and Switching Lab Exam <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Guy, does anyone know why I'm getting the following error when I start dynamips using the .net file from ipexpert 209-unable to start vm instance I not running vmware because I running the R&S track -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090701/89e5aedc/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:06:56 +0930 From: Antonio Dee <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Wish you all the luck Rob !!!! From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:25:58 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology All I take my first attempt at the lab tomorrow morning at RTP. Wish me luck. I'll let you know how it goes when I get the results. Cheers. From: Bryan Bartik [[email protected]] Sent: 07/01/2009 08:19 PM CST To: Carlos Valero <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology I have 3640's that support dot1q on Ethernet sub-interfaces. As far as I know, it was 2500s that did not support it. I didn't know 2600s had the same issue... On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Joe, Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB Routers? Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q on the Ethernet interfaces on these Routers. But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an Ethernet interface. I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. Could you please let me know? Thank you! --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: "'Terry Vinson'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM Hey Terry, Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said. I would have to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where you HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Vinson Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology Hi Guys, I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's and 2 3560's. I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed). My question is where should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities? I have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. Thanks, Terry Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _________________________________________________________________ Looking for a new car this winter? Let us help with car news, reviews and more http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2Ecom%2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801459%2Fpi%5F1004813%2Fai%5F859641&_t=762955845&_r=tig_OCT07&_m=EXT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090702/ec9ab274/attachment.htm End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 8 **************************************
