Static Override
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:43:18 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Are there any options to modify this behavior? If R1 and R3 are announcing the same group, is there a way to modify the default behavior and make R1 the preferred RP without adding higher IP address on R1? Thanks. From: prakash patel [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:38 AM AST To: Robert Wyzykowski; <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question Cisco Announce group. The Mapping Agents serve as the Rendezvous Point election agency by listening to the Cisco Announce group to receive Candidate-RP Announcements, selecting the highest IP address Candidate-RP for a group range and then multicast the election results to the 224.0.1.40 Cisco Discovery group. All Cisco routers in the network automatically join the 224.0.1.40 group so that they can learn the IP address of the elected Rendezvous Point for each group range. From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:34:36 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question I know in BSR we have the priority option. What is the similar option for auto-rp? From: Robert S Wyzykowski [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:31 AM AST To: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question When using auto-rp... If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping agent decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria for the election process? Thanks. From: Joe Astorino [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST To: "Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object Tracking This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and “If R5 loses the route to 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred gateway.” I configured the following: IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 reachability track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric threshold threshold metric up 65 down 66 track 100 list boolean or object 1 object 2 int fa0/0 vrrp 1 priority 150 vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 The PG did not use the track 100 list boolean or option. I’m still a bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered correct or not? Thanks, Rich -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone. _________________________________________________________________ Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
