Again ymmv but I wouldn't deploy eigrp unless you're sure you're always going to be a vendor c shop. Changing igp later on is a pain the bigger the network gets. Summarization is also something that I'd be careful with deploying - if I'd exceed n amount of prefixes in my igp I'd rather start carrying them all in bgp unsummarized (except for RAS or BRAS hells where people get /32s a lot). For any kind of advanced TE summarization is poison.
Kaj > From: Ryan Hughes <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:48:01 -0700 > To: Jason Leblanc <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF Design Question > > Why are you set on using OSPF and not something like EIGRP? It seems like you > have a cisco only environment and typically OSPF is deployed for mixed vendor. > IMHO, it is easier to manage route summarization with EIGRP than area > placement with OSPF.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
