In my opinion, take the track that you have a passion for. If you like VOICE then go for it, doesn't matter how long it is gonna take. Obtaining a CCIE is an achievement not a requirement. You gotta love what you do ?. I personally like working with routing protocols. I do not like QOS or Voice that much, therefore I am going for R & S.
--- On Tue, 11/17/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 46, Issue 73 To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 12:00 PM Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 (Matt Hill) 2. (no subject) (suneer.A suneer) 3. Re: Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) (Gabriel Ruiz) 4. Re: Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) (pra pa) 5. Re: Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) (Tyson Scott) 6. Re: Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 (Bryan Bartik) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:24:22 +1100 From: Matt Hill <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 To: Rodney Tuten <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Rodney! How's it all going? ;) You can be pedantic with the "one neighbour statement" and "one line in the access-list" type statements by using their respective groups... ie... router bgp 1234 neighbor 1.2.3.4 peer-group BMWIN4MONTHS neighbor BMWIN4MONTHS remote-as xxx neighbor BMWIN4MONTHS soft-reconfig in neighbor BMWIN4MONTHS route-map blah nieghbor BMWIN4MONTHS etc etc Good luck with all of that... Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 2009/11/17 Rodney Tuten <[email protected]>: > Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 > > 5.1 states that R4,R5 & R6 can only have one neighbor statement. However when > you look at the configure this section on the Detailed Solutions Guide > multiple neighbor statements to set the remote-as and the update-source then > again in 5.3 you issue another neighbor statement to set "soft-reconfig in" > and again in 5.4 setting up EBGP between R6 and BB2 you set up more neighbor > statements. > Now when I interpret the instruction "R4, R5 and R6 can only have one > neighbor statement." > I take that to mean you can only use the neighbor command once in the BGP > section for those 3 routers is this a mistake in the Lab or am I reading it > wrong? > > > Kind regards, > > Rodney Tuten > Technical Instructor > EXCOM Education > Ground Floor, 23 Barrack Street | Perth | WA | 6000 > Tel: +61 (0)8 9221 7706 | ? Fax: +61 (0)8 9221 7707 > http://www.excom.com.au > ? Please consider your environment before printing > Microsoft Learning Solution Partner of the Year 2008 (AU), 2007 (AU) & 2004 > (ANZ) | Microsoft World Wide Certified Partner Learning Solutions Finalist > 2006 | Cisco Learning Partner > Novell Partner of the Year 2008 & 2007 (APAC) | Citrix Authorised Learning > Centre of the Year 2007 (ANZ), 2006 (ANZ), 2004 & 2003 | Prometric Award of > Excellence (South East Asia) 2007 > > http://www.excom.com.au/cindex62.aspx > (Australia) > > Adelaide ~ Auckland ~ Brisbane ~ Canberra ~ Melbourne ~ Singapore ~ Sydney ~ > Perth > > This electronic mail/facsimile contains information that is privileged and > confidential, intended only for use of the individual(s) named or addresses > listed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, copying or > use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > transmission in error please delete it (including any attachments) > immediately from your system and inform us via email at > mailto:[email protected] or fax: +61 (0)8 9221 7707 > > It is the recepient's responsibility using this form of communication to > virus scan or otherwise test this email prior to opening any files attached. > The author will not be liable to you or any other person for any loss or > damage (including direct, consequential or economic loss or damage) however > caused and whether by negligence or otherwise which may result directly or > indirectly from the receipt or use of this communication or any files > attached to it. If you would prefer not to recieve future emails please > http://www.excom.com.au/unsubscribeor please reply to this email with the > subject "Unsubscribe Me". > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:29:45 +0530 From: "suneer.A suneer" <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] (no subject) To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091117/e411a504/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:14:19 -0500 From: "Gabriel Ruiz" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Message-ID: <004701ca677f$7e7513f0$7b5f3b...@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" As a follow up for this post (I have a similar situation): I took the the ccie voice lab (v2.0) last march and I failed. I few things change in my career and I had to put the second attempt on hold. Now I'm reassessing if I should try again the voice or I have better chances for RS or Security to pass it in less attempts. Most of my experience in voice; however I've had a lot of experience in security. In RS, I have very little experience with BGP, OSPF and MPLS. I'm thinking of the RS in lieu that the voice was so difficult specially for the time management part. Please let me know if someone can share some insight of what should I do. Or maybe I should just stick to voice and rework all the 7.X stuff... Thanks, I'm kind of some crossroads and some input would help. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iwan Hoogendoorn Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:39 PM To: MANNY Omari Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? Manny, Continue with R&S. My thougts on this is "If you start something you have to finish it" -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 2009/11/15 MANNY Omari <[email protected]>: > > > Hello Dears, > > I'm in the middle of CCIE R&S i have done volume one workbook of IPexpert > but i really do not have experience in R&S i have three years of experience > with Cisco PIX Firewalls, ASA Firewalls, VPN concentrator,? and IPS but i > started CCIE R&S and passed written exam too and also read alot of books > done workbook volum-1 of IPexpert, Just need your advice should i stope R&S > and start the journey for CCIE Security. > > Thanks, > > MANNY > > ________________________________ > Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you?re up to on > Facebook. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:36:02 -0500 From: pra pa <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" All tracks are same. They have used a word "EXPERT". SO try to be expert in either way :-) _________________________________________________________________ Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more. http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen:112009v2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091117/2d55659c/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:48:11 -0500 From: "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) To: "'Gabriel Ruiz'" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Message-ID: <007101ca6794$fcd41a60$f67c4f...@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Gabriel, >From what I have heard Voice version 3.0 in comparison to version 2.0 is a little easier. Not that the content is easier more that time management is not as hard. There are a lot of features in the new UCM software that have been designed to make an administrators life easier and this then roles into the test. Also if you have been watching the Voice list there have been a lot of successful candidates with our workbooks with the new version. I would continue with the path you have already started. Going for either the R&S or Security is going to be a complete regroup for you. We can definitely support you in that path but it may not be the best option for you. Regards, ? Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: [email protected] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gabriel Ruiz Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:14 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? (Or Voice) As a follow up for this post (I have a similar situation): I took the the ccie voice lab (v2.0) last march and I failed. I few things change in my career and I had to put the second attempt on hold. Now I'm reassessing if I should try again the voice or I have better chances for RS or Security to pass it in less attempts. Most of my experience in voice; however I've had a lot of experience in security. In RS, I have very little experience with BGP, OSPF and MPLS. I'm thinking of the RS in lieu that the voice was so difficult specially for the time management part. Please let me know if someone can share some insight of what should I do. Or maybe I should just stick to voice and rework all the 7.X stuff... Thanks, I'm kind of some crossroads and some input would help. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iwan Hoogendoorn Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:39 PM To: MANNY Omari Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Which track, R&S or Sec? Manny, Continue with R&S. My thougts on this is "If you start something you have to finish it" -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 2009/11/15 MANNY Omari <[email protected]>: > > > Hello Dears, > > I'm in the middle of CCIE R&S i have done volume one workbook of IPexpert > but i really do not have experience in R&S i have three years of experience > with Cisco PIX Firewalls, ASA Firewalls, VPN concentrator,? and IPS but i > started CCIE R&S and passed written exam too and also read alot of books > done workbook volum-1 of IPexpert, Just need your advice should i stope R&S > and start the journey for CCIE Security. > > Thanks, > > MANNY > > ________________________________ > Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you?re up to on > Facebook. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Iwan Hoogendoorn CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:01:00 -0700 From: Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 To: Rodney Tuten <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Rodney, I see what you mean and I felt the same way when I first went through these labs as a student. What they means is really one neighbor defined, so that R2 (I think it's R2, I haven't looked at the lab) is the Route Reflector. In any case, the proctor should be able to clarify. Good luck, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Rodney Tuten <[email protected]> wrote: > Clarification on Lab14 Vol2 v11.0 > > 5.1 states that R4,R5 & R6 can only have one neighbor statement. However > when you look at the configure this section on the Detailed Solutions Guide > multiple neighbor statements to set the remote-as and the update-source then > again in 5.3 you issue another neighbor statement to set "soft-reconfig in" > and again in 5.4 setting up EBGP between R6 and BB2 you set up more neighbor > statements. > Now when I interpret the instruction "R4, R5 and R6 can only have one > neighbor statement." > I take that to mean you can only use the neighbor command once in the BGP > section for those 3 routers is this a mistake in the Lab or am I reading it > wrong? > > > Kind regards, > > Rodney Tuten > Technical Instructor > EXCOM Education > Ground Floor, 23 Barrack Street | Perth | WA | 6000 > Tel: +61 (0)8 9221 7706 | Fax: +61 (0)8 9221 7707 > http://www.excom.com.au > ? Please consider your environment before printing > Microsoft Learning Solution Partner of the Year 2008 (AU), 2007 (AU) & 2004 > (ANZ) | Microsoft World Wide Certified Partner Learning Solutions Finalist > 2006 | Cisco Learning Partner > Novell Partner of the Year 2008 & 2007 (APAC) | Citrix Authorised Learning > Centre of the Year 2007 (ANZ), 2006 (ANZ), 2004 & 2003 | Prometric Award of > Excellence (South East Asia) 2007 > > http://www.excom.com.au/cindex62.aspx > (Australia) > > Adelaide ~ Auckland ~ Brisbane ~ Canberra ~ Melbourne ~ Singapore ~ Sydney > ~ Perth > > This electronic mail/facsimile contains information that is privileged and > confidential, intended only for use of the individual(s) named or addresses > listed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, copying or > use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > transmission in error please delete it (including any attachments) > immediately from your system and inform us via email at mailto: > [email protected] or fax: +61 (0)8 9221 7707 > > It is the recepient's responsibility using this form of communication to > virus scan or otherwise test this email prior to opening any files attached. > The author will not be liable to you or any other person for any loss or > damage (including direct, consequential or economic loss or damage) however > caused and whether by negligence or otherwise which may result directly or > indirectly from the receipt or use of this communication or any files > attached to it. If you would prefer not to recieve future emails please > http://www.excom.com.au/unsubscribeor please reply to this email with the > subject "Unsubscribe Me". > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20091117/d01d6fc3/attachment-0001.htm End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 46, Issue 73 ***************************************
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
