Team,
1- I am wondering if R4, R5, R6 in the sub-autonomous system 620 should not be
either fully meshed (the bgp set up shows they are not...), or R4 should be
configured as Route-Reflector (RRs). I am recalling the rule which says, either
iBGP members are fully meshed, or then RRs should be configured. Can someone
shed some light on this?
2- Task 7-7 of the same LAB uses MEDs to make "R5 the preferred route" for
route 172.16.4.0/24. I am left with no understanding of what is being asked
here !. Is R5 a route? But more important, why is the MED being applied
on R5? I would assume MED should be applied on R7 towards R5 (outgoing), to
influence the way the traffic from route 172.16.4.0/24 comes to R7 (incoming).
Of course the solution is correct I just would like to understand the reasoning
behind...
Thanks
Bauke
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
