this is working when i down the eigrp neighbor with passive-interface/no
passive-interface on the eigrp neighbor, (see below if i am understanding
what you are doing), but you say that you "down the eigrp route onward in
the network" how are you taking this route out of the eigrp table and
putting it back in, as where i am taking down the neighborship and bringing
it back up...
also running this in gns3, with Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software
(C7200-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4(22)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
R1#sh ip ro
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
25.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 25.25.25.25 [90/2297856] via 1.1.1.2, 00:00:41, Serial1/0
R1#
*Mar 8 17:55:31.399: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 25: Neighbor 1.1.1.2
(Serial1/0) is down: Interface Goodbye received
*Mar 8 17:55:31.399: RT: delete route to 25.25.25.25 via 1.1.1.2, eigrp
metric [90/2297856]
*Mar 8 17:55:31.403: RT: no routes to 25.25.25.25
*Mar 8 17:55:31.403: RT: NET-RED 25.25.25.25/32
*Mar 8 17:55:31.403: RT: delete subnet route to 25.25.25.25/32
*Mar 8 17:55:31.407: RT: NET-RED 25.25.25.25/32
*Mar 8 17:55:31.407: RT: add 25.25.25.25/32 via 1.1.1.2, static metric
[210/0]
*Mar 8 17:55:31.407: RT: NET-RED 25.25.25.25/32
R1#sh ip route
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
25.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 25.25.25.25 [210/0] via 1.1.1.2
R1#
*Mar 8 17:56:56.463: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 25: Neighbor 1.1.1.2
(Serial1/0) is up: new adjacency
*Mar 8 17:56:58.579: RT: closer admin distance for 25.25.25.25, flushing 1
routes
*Mar 8 17:56:58.583: RT: NET-RED 25.25.25.25/32
*Mar 8 17:56:58.583: RT: add 25.25.25.25/32 via 1.1.1.2, eigrp metric
[90/2297856]
*Mar 8 17:56:58.587: RT: NET-RED 25.25.25.25/32
R1#sh ip route
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
25.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 25.25.25.25 [90/2297856] via 1.1.1.2, 00:00:10, Serial1/0
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Mark Beynon <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have lab'd up a work solution in GNS, and it is not behaving how I
> would expect. This has lead me to question my understanding some what.
>
> The scenario, I have a router that learns the host route
> 25.25.25.25/32 from eigrp. I then install a static to 25.25.25.25/32
> on this router in the othe direction, with and AD of 210.
>
> As expected the Eigrp route makes it into the route table. When I
> down the eigrp route onward in the network, it is removed from Eigrp,
> and my static springs into life.
>
> But... When I reintroduce the route, the static with worse AD stays in
> the route table, despite it learning a route with better AD.
>
> I have run a debug and confirmed that eigrp is sending the update to
> this router. there is something I'm missing, and I think it is
> understanding over config...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
