Rogelio,
Thanks for the clarification.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Rogelio <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, same would happen with access sw in place. To avoid too many
> adjacencies configure passive interface default and no passive interface on
> vlan's where you want adjacencies formed.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Victor Reyes II <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Okay. So then the other issue is if I trunk vlan 37 between the switches
> then try to advertise vlan 37 to the rest of the network an ospf
> relationship forms via the trunk between the distribution switches. Which
> states that would happen for every vlan I add to the distribution switches.
> Is what I am saying correct.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mar 16, 2010 5:19 PM, "Rogelio Gamino" < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would trunk vlan 37 between the two distribution switches. If the access
> switch goes down you will have split your IP space and that could cause
> connectivity issues (unless you have another access switch passing VLAN 37
> between the two distribution switches).
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Victor Reyes II wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a few questions r...
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit <http://www.ipexpert.com>www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
