Ray, I think that would be fine, doesn't seem to break the restrictions.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:30 AM, RAragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > > I was wondering about an alternate solution; would we meet requirements if > R5 and R6 were in the same AS-Confederation. in other words they both have > "router bgp 65413" in their configs. > > R2 could still have an iBGP neighborship with R4 and eBGP with R6 (I guess > I could have picked R5). > So in this alternate solution R6 would use send updates to R5 as an > intra-confederation update. So R6 would relate BGP information to R2 and and > R2 sould cascade information since it was learned via eBGP. > > It seems to me that for this task both options would work (this alternate + > the solution guide). > > > Regards, > > > Ray > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
