Hi All, I do not like the approach that the DSG shows for this task: by using
router rip ... network 192.168.1.0 network 192.168.8.0 network 192.168.16.0 network 192.168.24.0 no auto-summary Every RIP updated is advertised 4 additional times over the link; and since we updating using broadcasts 5 identical copies of every RIP update are transmitted. *Mar 2 19:47:51.630: RIP: received v2 update from 150.100.12.1 on FastEthernet0/0 *Mar 2 19:47:51.638: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.1.1 on FastEthernet0/0 *Mar 2 19:47:51.638: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.8.1 on FastEthernet0/0 *Mar 2 19:47:51.638: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.16.1 on FastEthernet0/0 *Mar 2 19:47:51.638: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.24.1 on FastEthernet0/0 I have taken a slightly different approach and instead of using the network statements, I used "redistribute connected". Would that be an acceptable solution? I'm aware that some people are allergic to "redistribute connected", but I don't think I violated anything. Regards, Frank _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
