Seriously though: Cisco does more stuff, costs more, has TAC. HP does less stuff, costs less, poor tech support but has good hardware replacement because they even replace stuff that is EOL when it dies.
Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 On 8 April 2010 22:03, Bill <[email protected]> wrote: > If you are a Cisco partner there is a competitive slide deck you can > reference. > > What information do you want? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Hill > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:10 AM > To: raghav gurung > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Comparision between Cisco products and > HPProcurve > > Yes > > One is good. The other is not. > > Cheers, > Matt > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 08/04/2010, at 16:18, raghav gurung <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Do any one have comparison of CISO Vs HP Procurve. >> >> -- >> Regd >> Raghav Gurung >> +91 9582307405 >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
