Could someone clarify a little question about BGP Confederations, please ?

Well, here is the thing: Odom's CCIE R&S Cert Guide v4, page 412, figure
4-10 and example 10-14 have something I cannot grasp.

If sub-ASes use eBGP rules to inform about updates between themselves, why
should I use the neighbor next-hop-self command, between different sub-ASes
?

The update flying inside AS 123 without change the NEXT_HOP received by
R1(sub-AS 65001) and R3 (sub-AS 65023).


Where is the catch ?


-- 

CCNA - Cisco Certified Network Associate
CCNP - Cisco Certified Network Professional

"A bird that you set free may be caught again, but a word that escapes your
lips will not return." Jewish Proverb
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to