In the first place I would never configure this in my lab, unless it's asked 
for! 
In 99% of the cases your loopback address (the default LDP Router ID) will be 
reachable for the other side via your IGP, so the TCP session for LDP will also 
be using the Loopbacks as source and destination address and the session will 
come up. So it's very important that your LDP Router ID is reachable for the 
other side.
To overcome this issue (or when using multiple links and you want LDP 
load-balancing) you should use the interface address (which is ALWAYS reachable 
by the other side) to be the transport-address, meaning that it will not use 
the Router ID as source and destination, but use the interface addresses for 
the TCP session.

I hope this answers your question.


-- 
Regards,

Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On 5 mei 2010, at 06:48, venkat wrote:

> And this transport-address should be reachable from neighbor to form 
> adjacency.
> 
> On 5/5/10, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It forces creation of LDP session using that particular address/interface
>> (by default LDP RID is used). If there is more than one link to the other
>> LDP router, you should use the same transport address.
>> 
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Mustafa Yadav
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> 
>>> hi guys
>>> 
>>> mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface
>>> 
>>> Why the above command is so critical?Without this the ldp neighborship did
>>> not come up/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to