Hello All,

Is there any reason why this would not satisfy the requirements for the
Loopback advertisements for this task?  This approach seems to be a little
more specific without needing to redistribute connected routes in BGP.  It
appears that I achieve the same result, but I'd prefer another set of eyes
and opinions.

R2
----------------------------------------------------------
access-list 1 permit 200.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

route-map bgploop
set origin incomplete
match ip address 1

router bgp 256
network 200.0.0.2 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.1.2 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.3.2 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop

R5
----------------------------------------------------------
access-list 1 permit 200.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

route-map bgploop
set origin incomplete
match ip address 1

router bgp 256
network 200.0.0.5 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.1.5 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.2.5 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.3.5 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop

R6
----------------------------------------------------------
access-list 1 permit 200.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

route-map bgploop
set origin incomplete
match ip address 1

router bgp 256
network 200.0.0.6 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.1.6 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.2.6 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop
network 200.0.3.6 mask 255.255.255.255 route-map bgploop


The sh ip bgp output from R2 is below:

R2(config-router)#do sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 23, local router ID is 200.0.3.2
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 150.100.25.0/24  0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
*>i150.100.69.0/24  150.100.100.6            0    100      0 i
*>i150.100.96.0/24  150.100.100.6            0    100      0 i
*> 150.100.100.0/24 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
*> 200.0.0.2/32     0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
*>i200.0.0.5/32     150.100.100.5            0    100      0 ?
*>i200.0.0.6/32     150.100.100.6            0    100      0 ?
*> 200.0.1.2/32     0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
*>i200.0.1.5/32     150.100.100.5            0    100      0 ?
*>i200.0.1.6/32     150.100.100.6            0    100      0 ?
*> 200.0.2.2/32     0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
*>i200.0.2.5/32     150.100.100.5            0    100      0 ?
*>i200.0.2.6/32     150.100.100.6            0    100      0 ?
*> 200.0.3.2/32     0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
*>i200.0.3.5/32     150.100.100.5            0    100      0 ?
*>i200.0.3.6/32     150.100.100.6            0    100      0 ?
R2(config-router)#

R2(config-router)#do sh ip bgp 200.0.0.6
BGP routing table entry for 200.0.0.6/32, version 15
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
  Advertised to update-groups:
        2
  Local, (Received from a RR-client)
    150.100.100.6 from 150.100.100.6 (200.0.3.6)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
R2(config-router)#

Regards,
-- 
Darrell Arbaugh
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to