Oooooops. Sorry bout that just realized I sent out to wrong email !!

Sorry!
-nick
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:59:31 
To: Jay McMickle<[email protected]>; 
<[email protected]>; Markku Leiniö<[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoFR- Workbook1, 6.10

danielle, 
             We qualify for over 980,000 and if we add my income that almost 
doubles. If we were to make an offer of 959,000 do you think they will play 
ball considering we have 35% down payment on that house? 

Thanks!

-nick
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay McMickle <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:02:45 
To: Markku Leiniö<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PPPoFR- Workbook1, 6.10

Correct, the virtual template interfaces aren't expected to come up, but the 
virtual access is.
I followed the dsg exactly, so I guess I need to look at the final configs to 
see what I missed unless someone has had the same issue.

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, MCSE
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Markku Leiniö <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi! As far as I know, *virtual-template* interfaces never come up as
> they are just used as templates. What is the situation with the
> *virtual-access* interface(s) that are created automatically?
> 
> Markku
> 
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Has anyone run across issues with the Virtual templates not coming up with
>> the PPP over Frame-Relay?  I tried it my way, looked at the DSG, reloaded my
>> routers, and put in the DSG commands line by line.  I'm using the physical
>> interface (not sub-interfaces) for the frame-relay interface-dlci x1x ppp
>> virtual-template1 after the VT's are created.  Again, I followed it step by
>> step, using the physical interfaces of the 150.100.24.x and 150.100.100.x
>> interfaces.  I know the lab isn't wrong, so I'm wondering if there is a
>> catch in a previous step that I missed that is a pre-requisite for this
>> task.
>> 
>> Anyone recently looked at this and had the same issues?  I've reloaded by
>> routers back to task 6.8.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, MCSE
>> 
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to