Since it's on the blueprint, we cover it in some of our labs. 

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Free CCIE Training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Community: http://www.ipexpert.com/communities

:: Sent from my phone. Apologies for errors and brevity. ::

On Aug 25, 2010, at 6:42, Ben Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey guys,
> 
>  
> 
> I’ve just setup my lab with Dynamips and real switches.  I’m using a 3550 as 
> a breakout switch though and as a result can’t get l2protocol tunnelling to 
> work – ie no CDP/VTP/STP between virtual world and real world.  Just 
> wondering if there is anything in IPExpert labs where the l2protocol 
> tunnelling would be a requirement?
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ben.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of --Hammer--
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 August 2010 2:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] GNS3 as a study aid
> 
>  
> 
> Good response Adam. I too am using GNS3 with physical switches. I'm working 
> thru the IPExpert volumes and haven't seen any significant problems yet. As 
> someone who has successfully failed the lab I can say that using GNS to 
> prepare for the configuration section works pretty well. If you don't have 
> real switches, then you'll really need to rent-a-rack at least a few times to 
> get your switching skills homed. Other than that, it's a great product. 
> 
> 
>  
> --Hammer--
> 
> On 8/24/2010 5:58 PM, Adam Booth wrote:
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Welcome to the list.  I would like to suggest that rather than piggy backing 
> onto an existing mail thread and asking a completely different topic that in 
> the future you start a new one.  The reason being is that I don't think 
> everyone will open up a thread asking about SNMP unless they are interested, 
> so you may miss out on their possible input about a topic like using 
> GNS3/Dynamips.
> 
> Tools like GNS3/dynamips can certainly be helpful and there are people that 
> use it as their main study aid but there are sometimes problems and 
> limitations that are generally chalked up to occurring with the emulation 
> platform.  The volume 1 workbooks from IPExpert includes a .net topology that 
> can be used.  To use dynamips effectively you are going to have do a good 
> amount of research and learning, searching the mailing list archives, CCIE 
> blogs, the Dynamips forum http://7200emu.hacki.at/ and googling as well as 
> fiddling around for yourself prior to asking for help should be your tools - 
> depending on your circumstances this might be an added difficulty that you 
> can do without and so the other alternatives of renting time on a rack or 
> buying actual routers and switches for your home lab may be worth while - or 
> even using a combination of the different methods depending on the technology 
> you are using and the network complexity.
> 
> In my personal circumstances I am using dynamips and real switches but if it 
> gets to a particular point where I am not happy with how my environment is 
> performing, I am prepared to change to rack rentals.  My thoughts on the 
> matter when I was first actually committing my personal effort towards the 
> CCIE are in my blog 
> http://noshut.blogspot.com/2010/02/is-having-home-lab-like-having-home-gym.html
>  - I haven't sat the exam so I cant say it has categorically work for me and 
> to be honest even if I purely used rack rentals, I think I would use dynamips 
> anyway as its good to quickly bang something together and test if theres a 
> particular problem case in your mind - and its something you can carry about 
> with you and use on a laptop - not so each to lug a number of 2811s around 
> with you :)
> 
> Hope that's of some help - I have changed the message subject so hopefully 
> you will also get some more opinions too.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Lackraj, Andy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
>               Looking to do the IE and was wondering how many of you guys 
> have used GNS3 and how is it? Would it be adequate tool to prepare for the 
> lab?
> 
>  
> 
> Any feedback is appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
> Thx..
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Booth
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:23 AM
> To: Taqdir Singh
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] snmp engine id
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Taqdir,
> 
> The engine id is used with the snmp user password to generate the MD5 digests 
> (the system will not store the passwords - just the engine id and MD5, so if 
> one or the other changes, you need to use the password and regenerate the MD5 
> hash. RFC2274 discusses the user security model)
> 
> Another thing I think was introduced with SNMPv3 but I'm pretty sure can also 
> be used with SNMP 2c is the use of SNMP Views.  This basically allow limiting 
> which parts of the MIB tree that can be looked at for a particular user or 
> community, an example would to allow a managed customer to pull out interface 
> stats and cpu load but not see everything else...
> 
> Cheers,
> Adam
> 
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Taqdir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>  
> 
> In snmp v1 and v2c there was no concept of engine id and no authentication 
> and encryption
> 
>  
> 
> so snmp v3 came with md5 authentication and encryption of packets.
> 
>  
> 
> what is the purpose of snmp engine id local and remote  in snmp v3? .... 
> default is also set...
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> --
> 
> Taqdir Singh
> 
> /Networks
> 
>  
> 
> Do today what others won't, so you can live tomorrow as others can't
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
>  
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If 
> the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized 
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by return 
> email and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>   
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to