Yes, it's the latest. Page 29 is the PDF page number and not the stamped page number at the bottom right.
Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:32 PM, "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Jay, > > > > I just downloaded the latest version of the DSG and it has 38 pages, however > they are numbered from 269 – 308. Do you have the latest version of the WB > and DSG’s? > > > > Thx > > Steve > > > > From: Jay McMickle [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:09 PM > To: Di Bias, Steve; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1- Task 10.13 > > > > Yes, I agree, I was combining 10.13 and 10.14. > > > > 10.13- > > I have re-added the passive interface to R8 f0/1. > > > > 10.14- > > I added the mtu-ignore commands on R8, CAT3 and CAT4. > > > > What is weird is that the DSG for lab 10, page 29, it shows that CAT1 is > peering with R8, on 150.100.178.x. How is that possible if that network is > the GRE tunnel between R7 and R8 (page 25 of DSG)? > > > > I'm going to save off the configs and compare them to the final configs to > see what I'm missing. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > Regards, > > Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE > > > > > > > > > > From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, August 24, 2010 9:53:20 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1- Task 10.13 > > Mismatched area ids and mtu are different issues. On r8 you are running two > ospf processes and this is whar is causing this error. According to your ospf > neighbors nobody is stuck in exstart which is how the would look if you had a > mismatch. > > I just checked the dsg and the resolution to your area id mismatch is to make > the interface passive under the second ospf process fpr task 10.13: > > For task 10.14 it discusses using mtu ignore on r8 cat3 and i think 4 because > they were stuck in exstart. > > This is how my dsg shows it anyway > > Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Jay McMickle" <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, Aug 24, 2010 7:40 pm > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1- Task 10.13 > To: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > > Gary- Normally, I would agree, however, this is something special in this > lab, as the DSG shows the errors. > > > > Steve- I did try that, and waited, but in the DSG, it shows that isn't a fix. > It states that following the steps of ip ospf mtu-ignore, but I did that and > I didn't make any success. > > > > Here's what's weird, and it may be a code issue: > > on S1- > > I see the VLAN2200 speaking OSPF, and it shows DR, but there aren't any > neighbors. In the DSG, it shows that S1 is peering with R8 over > 150.100.178.8 (shown below). How is that possible? The 150.100.178.x > network is the GRE tunnel between R7 and R8 and S1 shouldn't be even in that > network. On S1, I'm running a 3560-48PS with 122-35.SE5 with IP services. > > > > The final configs don't show 150.100.178.x as being configured on it (shown > at the bottom). Am I missing something? > > > > > > S1#sh ip ospf int bri > Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C > Vl2200 2 0 150.100.81.11/24 1 DR 0/0 > Lo0 2 0 200.0.0.11/32 1 LOOP 0/0 > Fa0/23 2 0 150.101.12.1/24 1 BDR 1/1 > Fa0/21 2 0 150.101.13.1/24 1 DR 1/1 > Fa0/19 2 0 150.101.14.1/24 1 BDR 1/1 > S1# > S1# > S1# > S1# > S1#sh ip ospf neigh > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 200.0.0.12 1 FULL/DR 00:00:30 150.101.12.2 > FastEthernet0/23 > 200.0.0.13 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:35 150.101.13.3 > FastEthernet0/21 > 200.0.0.14 1 FULL/DR 00:00:38 150.101.14.4 > FastEthernet0/19 > S1# > S1# > S1# > S1# > > > Final configs- > > interface Vlan2200 > > ip address 150.100.81.11 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > router ospf 2 > > ispf > > log-adjacency-changes > > max-lsa 30 95 > > network 150.100.81.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > network 150.101.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > network 150.101.13.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > network 150.101.14.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > network 200.0.0.11 0.0.0.0 area 0 > > > > Regards, > > Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE > > > > > > > > > > From: "Di Bias, Steve" <[email protected]> > To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, August 24, 2010 9:14:17 PM > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1- Task 10.13 > > I think you may be mixing two different tasks (13 and 14) > > > > To make this go away try making the fa0/1 interface passive on R8 > > > > Router ospf 2 > > Passive-interface fa0/1 > > > > That should take care of the %OSPF error > > > > Verify the output of the “show ip interface ospf brief” command, neighbor > should be in EXSTART if you have an MTU mismatch. > > > > To view the MTU on the interfaces of a routers use the following command > > > > Router#sh int fa0/1 | in MTU > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, > > > > > > On your Cat3 and Cat4 disable the MTU on the fa0/21 (Cat3) and the fa0/19 > (Cat4) > > > > That should do it! > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay McMickle > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1- Task 10.13 > > > > When configuring the OSPF section, I get the error about mismatch area: > > > > *Aug 24 23:20:25.591: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area > ID, from backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 150.100.81.11, > FastEthernet0/1 > > > > The DSG shows to be getting these errors, too. However, the resolution was > to use ip ospf mtu-ignore. However, that didn't resolve my issue, even after > enabling on all devices. > > > > My R8 Config- > > R8#sh run int f0/1 > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 117 bytes > ! > interface FastEthernet0/1 > ip address 150.100.81.8 255.255.255.0 > ip ospf mtu-ignore > duplex auto > speed auto > end > > > > I have configured mtu-ignore on all of the interfaces running OSPF on the > switches and the router interface. > > > > My MTU is set at 1508 on all of the switches (and I don't know how to verify > the routers MTU). > > > > What am I missing? The ERRRCV errors are occuring every 10 seconds. > > > > > > > Regards, > > Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE > > > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. > If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail > and destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. > If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail > and destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. > If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail > and destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
