Hey everyone,
I'm confused on yet another question, although I understand CBWFQ which is very
simple to configure (bandwidth, bandwidth percent, or bandwidth remaining) I'm
really not understanding why the DSG shows us using 85% of the interface
bandwidth?
Using the 75% rule I configured my CBWFQ which doesn't match the DSG (again).
The 75% rule states that the bandwidth calculation should not exceed 75% of the
total available bandwidth for the interface.
So my configuration (see below) doesn't exceed the 75% recommendation whereas
the DSG does exceed it (see below) by 10 totaling 85%.
So would I lose points on this question since I used 75%? Where does the DSG
get this 85% from?? Why would we use 85%?
My configs
class-map match-all TEST-Sql
match dscp af31
class-map match-all TEST-Citrix
match dscp af21
class-map match-all TEST-Ftp
match dscp af11
class-map match-all TEST-KazNap
match dscp cs1
policy-map R7-to-R8
class TEST-Sql
bandwidth percent 25
class TEST-Citrix
bandwidth percent 20
class TEST-Ftp
bandwidth percent 16
class TEST-KazNap
bandwidth percent 8
class class-default
bandwidth percent 6
int s0/0
service-policy output R7-to-R8
The DSG policy-map Configs
policy-map R7-to-R8-Output
class TEST-Sql
bandwidth percent 29
class TEST-Citrix
bandwidth percent 25
class TEST-Ftp
bandwidth percent 17
class TEST-KazNap
bandwidth percent 8
class class-default
bandwidth percent 6
Marko and Tyson I'm sure you are off teaching a bootcamp so you wont respond
quickly so thanks in advace.
Steve
UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was sent to you in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
