because _ is used to match space

Try
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _123\)_

Also
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _123._ would work too but that would also
match 123[0-9] so the first option above is the better response.


Regards,
 
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cody Cook
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] AS-Path filtering and Confederations

Is there a way to filter out routes that transit an AS that is a
confederation peer using an as-path access list?  I may be missing
something but I am unable to get it to work in my lab.  Say you have
the following output from sh ip bgp:

*>i191.15.0.23/32   191.15.0.2               0    100      0 (23) ?

*> 210.4.43.0       191.15.0.23              0    100      0 (23 123)
110 70 115 e

*> 210.210.20.0     191.15.0.23              0    100      0 (23 63) 70 e

*> 210.210.21.0     191.15.0.23              0    100      0 (23) 70 e

I can manipulate the AS paths external to the confederation how I want
using an as-path list applying them to the neighbor via a route-map ,
but for those AS numbers within the confederation, I am unable to
filter in this manner.  For example:
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _110_    Works
ip as-path access-list 1 deny _123_    Does not work

I have other methods for filtering this traffic as well, but I was
thinking that this would be a better solution in that I wouldn't have
to care about the specific routes from the AS in question.  Does this
make sense?  What am I missing here?

Thanks.
Cody
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to