Is that an assumption you'd make in the lab or an 'ask the proctor' situation?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > You shouldn't announce a NAT'ed route. > > Regards, > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Di Bias, Steve > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:08 PM > To: Rob Pool; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 Lab17.5 > > I have seen this question from time to time (myself included) so you're not > alone in your thinking here. The short answer is that the network should be > private, and by advertising it in OSPF, any traffic sent to the network > will > end up having a NAT'd response, causing unwanted issues (or something like > that) > > In all honesty, I'm not sure if you would lose points here or not, will > leave that for Tyson or Marko > > HTH > > Thank you. > > Steve Di Bias > Network Engineer - Information Systems > Valley Health System - Las Vegas > Office - 702- 369-7594 > Cell - 702-241-1801 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Pool > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 Lab17.5 > > The Task states the following: > > Configure R4 to translate any IP Traffic from subnet 150.100.40.0/24 > outbound to use it s0/0/0 interface. 150.100.41.0 should proceed unchanged. > > The DSG shows the OSPF process being modified to no longer advertise the > route of the natted network. I understand the thought process behind that, > but it doesn't seem necesary to meet the requirements of the task. I'm > trying to stick to the idea that if it's not called for then I'm not going > to make any additional changes. I was just wondering if maybe I was missing > something. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any > attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. If this was > sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
