Hi Aaron,

I don't have those work books but I don't think the route from 192.168.100.6
is meeting the feasability condition and therefore is not considered a
feasible successor and cant be used for unequal load-sharing.  It's
advertised metric is 1820160, which is less greater than the local computed
metric from 192.160.100.5 (1797120)

I think that if you increase the delay on 192.168.100.5 so that the computed
metric becomes greater than 1820160, the route from 192.168.100.6 will then
satisfy the feasability condition and become a feasible successor and then
unequal load balancing can occur.

I guess the other thing to look at is the load balancing mechanism on the
egress interface (ip load-sharing per-packet) could be what you want as
well.

Cheers,
Adam

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Aaron Moreck <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been having issues lately with EIGRP and i am suspicious that it is
> IOS bug related.  The other issue i had lately is that auto summary was not
> working as i expected it to.
>
> For my sanity can you see if anything jumps out with this config and show
> commands.
>
> Topology is from Vol 2 Lab 10 Task 5.3.  Where we are asked to configure so
> that R7 load-balances between R5 and R6  when accessing networks on the
> opposite side of R5 and R6
>
> Configuration on R7
>
> router eigrp 5678
>  variance 2
>  passive-interface default
>  no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
>  no passive-interface Serial0/0
>  network 192.168.11.5 0.0.0.0
>  network 192.168.100.7 0.0.0.0
>  network 200.0.0.7 0.0.0.0
>  maximum-paths 2
>  no auto-summary
> R7#sh ip route
> D EX    200.0.0.9 [170/1797120] via 192.168.100.5, 00:17:57,
> FastEthernet0/0
> D EX    200.0.0.2 [170/1797120] via 192.168.100.5, 00:17:57,
> FastEthernet0/0
> D EX    200.0.0.4 [170/1797120] via 192.168.100.5, 00:17:57,
> FastEthernet0/0
> D EX    200.0.0.5 [170/1797120] via 192.168.100.5, 00:17:59,
> FastEthernet0/0
> D EX    200.0.0.6 [170/1797120] via 192.168.100.5, 00:17:59,
> FastEthernet0/0
>
>
> R7#sh ip eigrp topology 200.0.0.4 255.255.255.255
> IP-EIGRP (AS 5678): Topology entry for 200.0.0.4/32
>  State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 1797120
>  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>  192.168.100.5 (FastEthernet0/0), from 192.168.100.5, Send flag is 0x0
>      Composite metric is (1797120/1794560), Route is External
>      Vector metric:
>        Minimum bandwidth is 1536 Kbit
>        Total delay is 5100 microseconds
>        Reliability is 255/255
>        Load is 1/255
>        Minimum MTU is 1500
>        Hop count is 1
>      External data:
>        Originating router is 200.0.0.5
>        AS number of route is 1
>        External protocol is OSPF, external metric is 66
>        Administrator tag is 110 (0x0000006E)
>  192.168.100.6 (FastEthernet0/0), from 192.168.100.6, Send flag is 0x0
>      Composite metric is (1822720/1820160), Route is External
>      Vector metric:
>        Minimum bandwidth is 1536 Kbit
>        Total delay is 6100 microseconds
>        Reliability is 255/255
>        Load is 1/255
>        Minimum MTU is 1500
>        Hop count is 1
>      External data:
>        Originating router is 200.0.0.6
>        AS number of route is 1
>        External protocol is OSPF, external metric is 66
>        Administrator tag is 110 (0x0000006E)
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to