Marc abel , you are spot on !
but does i think this is going to be state less failover ? is their a way to NAT synchronisaiton ? On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: > Plug your uplink and the interaces from the routers into a switch in the > same vlan. Use hsrp. You still will have a single point of failure. Unless > your provider provides dual hand offs. In this case plug each uplink and 1 > router into seperate switches and trunk them together. > On Jan 1, 2012 12:50 PM, "Imran Ali" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> i have only one uplink and my boss wants to implement redundancy of >> routers . >> >> >> if one router fails other should take over . HSRP , vrrp and GLBP all >> required dual links . but i want to achieve hardware redundancy and not >> link redundancy . is this possible ? >> >> >> the same can be achieved with asa in active and stanby mode .....but we >> have routers instead of ASA. >> >> Any idea , expert can guide me ? >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
