Thanks Ben, but that actually isn't the case. I was able to run a
continuous ping without problem.

You're partly right though...  I wasn't looking at the shared tree... For
that the RPF was correct and R1 was expecting to receive traffic on
FastEthernet0/0.12.  It's as if it wasn't chaning over to the source
tree...  I did not modify the threshold.

Jason

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Ben Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> I haven't looked up Lab10 but the first ping packet will get sent to the
> RP and forwarded from there to the receiver.  Then the following packets
> should go direct assuming you haven't changed the threshold.  If you try a
> ping with more than one packet you will probably find that subsequent pings
> fail.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> From: J D'Silva <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 21:48:58 -0700
> To: OSL Routing and Switching <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol3 Lab 10 Multicast
>
> HI All,
>
> I'm sure I'm just missing something basic, but I'm at a complete loss as to
> what it is.
>
> Like the subject says, Vol3 Lab 10.  Multicast section.  I have it up and
> working...  But it shouldn't be working.  My confusion is on R1.
>
> R1#sh ip pim int
>
> Address          Interface                           Ver/     Nbr
> Query  DR     DR
>                                                                Mode
> Count  Intvl     Prior
> 163.144.12.1     FastEthernet0/0.12        v2/S     1         30
> 1      163.144.12.2
> 163.144.131.1    FastEthernet0/0.131      v2/S    1         30
> 1      163.144.131.13
> 163.144.121.1    FastEthernet0/0.121      v2/S    1         30
> 1      163.144.121.12
>
>
> (163.144.245.4, 239.14.14.14), 00:03:21/00:00:08, flags:
>  Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 163.144.15.5
>  Outgoing interface list:
>    FastEthernet0/0.121, Forward/Sparse, 00:03:22/00:03:06
>    FastEthernet0/0.131, Forward/Sparse, 00:03:22/00:03:19
>
> R1#sh ip rpf 163.144.245.4
> RPF information for ? (163.144.245.4) failed, no route exists
>
> Jan  8 04:32:51.606: IP(0): s=163.144.245.4 (FastEthernet0/0.12)
> d=239.14.14.14 (FastEthernet0/0.131) id=127, ttl=253, prot=1, len=100(100),
> mforward
>
>
> The mroute looks off to me... There's no flags and there's no incoming
> interface...  The RPF neighour is R5 (task disallows multicast enabled on
> that link). You can also see the RPF if failing for the multicast source
> required to complete the task.  Yet, with debug IP mpacket you can see the
> mpacket is received, and forwarded, even though it should be failing the
> RPF check.
>
> Why the heck is R1 forwarding an mpacket that is failing RPF?
>
> I've managed to get all 7 points since I haven't added any mroutes....  But
> I also haven't used MBGP, which is likely what the task was getting at for
> the bonus points...
>
> R4#ping 239.14.14.14
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 239.14.14.14, timeout is 2 seconds:
>
> Reply to request 0 from 163.144.43.14, 76 ms
> Reply to request 0 from 163.144.43.14, 100 ms
> R4#
>
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to