here is my sh ip os int bri - command for both routers R9 AND R 98 R9
R9(config)#do sh ip os int bri Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C Se0/1 1 69 150.50.69.9/25 64 BDR 1/1 Fa0/0 1 96 150.50.98.9/25 10 BDR 1/1 R98 vlan98(config)#do sh ip os int bri Interface PID Area IP Address/Mask Cost State Nbrs F/C Fa0/0 1 96 150.50.98.10/25 10 DR 1/1 many thanks falles, khaled On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]>wrote: > guys, here the interfaces configuration of R9 AND R98 > > > R98 > > vlan98(config)#do sh ip os int > FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up > Internet Address 150.50.98.10/25, Area 96 > Process ID 1, Router ID 96.96.96.96, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 10 > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1 > Designated Router (ID) 96.96.96.96, Interface address 150.50.98.10 > Backup Designated router (ID) 200.0.0.9, Interface address 150.50.98.9 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > oob-resync timeout 40 > Hello due in 00:00:08 > Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) > Cisco NSF helper support enabled > IETF NSF helper support enabled > Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 4 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 200.0.0.9 (Backup Designated Router) > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > R9 > > FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up > Internet Address 150.50.98.9/25, Area 96 > Process ID 1, Router ID 200.0.0.9, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 10 > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State BDR, Priority 1 > Designated Router (ID) 96.96.96.96, Interface address 150.50.98.10 > Backup Designated router (ID) 200.0.0.9, Interface address 150.50.98.9 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > oob-resync timeout 40 > Hello due in 00:00:07 > Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) > Cisco NSF helper support enabled > IETF NSF helper support enabled > Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 96.96.96.96 (Designated Router) > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:01 PM, khaled al-ajeman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> yes indeed I can't see any of my 10.x.x.x routes in my R9 routing table >> as well. >> >> output of R9: >> >> >> >> R9(config)#do sir >> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP >> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area >> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 >> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 >> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS >> level-2 >> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static >> route >> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route >> Gateway of last resort is not set >> 200.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 5 subnets >> C 200.0.0.9 is directly connected, Loopback0 >> O IA 200.0.0.2 [110/129] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:50, Serial0/1 >> O IA 200.0.0.4 [110/193] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:50, Serial0/1 >> O IA 200.0.0.5 [110/129] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:50, Serial0/1 >> O IA 200.0.0.6 [110/65] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:50, Serial0/1 >> 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks >> O IA 10.10.0.0/23 [110/129] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:50, Serial0/1 >> O IA 10.1.1.0/24 [110/202] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:52, >> Serial0/1 >> O IA 10.10.22.0/24 [110/138] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:52, Serial0/1 >> 150.50.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 3 masks >> O 150.50.7.0/25 [110/74] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:52, >> Serial0/1 --------------------------> There is no signe of >> route 10.x.x.x routes >> O IA 150.50.24.0/24 [110/192] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:52, >> Serial0/1 in R98 routing table >> O IA 150.50.100.0/27 [110/128] via 150.50.69.6, 00:56:53, Serial0/1 >> C 150.50.98.0/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 >> C 150.50.69.0/25 is directly connected, Serial0/1 >> >> here is my R98 routing table output; >> >> R98(config)#DO SIR >> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP >> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area >> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 >> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 >> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS >> level-2 >> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static >> route >> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route >> Gateway of last resort is not set >> 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 6 subnets >> C 10.10.0.0 is directly connected, Loopback1 >> C 10.10.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback2 >> C 10.10.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback3 >> C 10.10.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback4 >> C 10.10.4.0 is directly connected, Loopback5 >> C 10.10.5.0 is directly connected, Loopback6 >> 150.50.0.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets >> C 150.50.98.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 >> ----------------- > There is no signe of route 150.50.69.0 that is coming >> from >> >> R9 Area 69 >> >> Any thoughts please, what is wrong with that? >> >> salam >> khaled >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Michael Davis - Webquor < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does show ip ospf database give you anything? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 06/03/2012, at 8:21 PM, "Ben Hughes" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hey khaled, >>> > >>> > Is there any ospf config on the interfaces? There is a command "ip >>> ospf database-filter all out" which will cause all LSAs to be filtered even >>> though the adjacency is up. >>> > >>> > How about trying some debugging? "debug ip ospf adj" is a good place >>> to start. >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > Ben. >>> > >>> > >>> > From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]<mailto: >>> [email protected]>> >>> > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:57:33 +0300 >>> > To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] need your help please >>> > >>> > Hi fellas, >>> > >>> > I have the neighbor relation ship formed between R9 and R98, however, >>> the >>> > routes are not travelling from R9 AND R98 and vise verse, can anyone >>> tell >>> > please why? >>> > >>> > Here is my configuration below: >>> > >>> > R9 >>> > >>> > R9(config)#do sh run | s os >>> > hostname R9 >>> > ip ospf network broadcast >>> > router ospf 1 >>> > log-adjacency-changes >>> > passive-interface default >>> > no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0 >>> > no passive-interface Serial0/1 >>> > network 150.50.69.0 0.0.0.255 area 69 >>> > network 150.50.98.0 0.0.0.127 area 96 >>> ------------------------------ >>> > I am looking at area 96 >>> > >>> > R98(config)#do sr | s os >>> > hostname vlan98 >>> > router ospf 1 >>> > router-id 96.96.96.96 >>> > log-adjacency-changes >>> > passive-interface default >>> > no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0 >>> > network 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.2.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.3.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.4.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.5.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 10.10.6.0 0.0.0.0 area 96 >>> > network 150.50.98.0 0.0.0.127 area >>> > 96 ------------------------------ area 96 >>> > >>> > the neighbor relationship forming bet R9 AND R98 >>> > >>> > >>> > R9 >>> > >>> > R9(config)#do sh ip os nei >>> > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address >>> Interface >>> > 200.0.0.6 1 FULL/DR 00:00:32 >>> > 150.50.69.6<32%20%20%20%20150.50.69.6> Serial0/1 >>> > 96.96.96.96 1 FULL/DR 00:00:32 150.50.98.10 >>> > FastEthernet0/0 --------------- successfully forming >>> > relationship with R98 >>> > R98 >>> > >>> > R98(config)#DO SH IP OS NEI >>> > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address >>> > Interface --------------------- successfully >>> forming >>> > relationship with R9 >>> > 200.0.0.9 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:34 150.50.98.9 >>> > FastEthernet0/0 >>> > >>> > >>> > thanks so much fellas >>> > >>> > khaled >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> > >>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
