Bob,

Thanks. I think this is ok for filtering purpose. But My concerns is about the 
default route which includes everything. 

But for Security prospective is it accurate to inject the default-route? 

 
     Jean-Marie NGOK 
 Senior Network Engineer
     


________________________________
 From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>
To: JM NGOK <[email protected]> 
Cc: Wilson Tuma <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Prefix-list doubt
 

JM,

I believe you're thinking of the 0.0.0.0/0 entry in the context of an 
access-list in which anything more specific than the entry will match. A 
prefix-list will *not* match a more specific entry unless the "ge" and/or "le" 
operators are used.

Go ahead and lab it up. I just did. R1 and R2 are doing EIGRP over Ethernet. R1 
has a number of prefixes it is injecting, including 0.0.0.0/0. Here is what I 
did on R2:

R2(config)#do sh ip ro eigrp | i D
>D    1.0.0.0/8 [90/409600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:02:31, FastEthernet0/0
>D       2.2.0.0 [90/409600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:02:31, FastEthernet0/0
>D       3.3.32.0 [90/409600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:02:31, FastEthernet0/0
>D       4.4.4.0 [90/409600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:02:31, FastEthernet0/0
>D       5.5.5.5 [90/409600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:02:31, FastEthernet0/0
>D*   0.0.0.0/0 [90/281600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:01:59, FastEthernet0/0
>
>
>!--- This matches the example prefix-list, even though the second line is 
>redundant with the implicit deny.
>R2(config)#ip prefix-list TEST permit 0.0.0.0/0
>R2(config)#ip prefix-list TEST deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
>
>
>R2(config)#router eigrp 1
>R2(config-router)#distribute-list prefix TEST in
>*Mar  1 00:17:03.375: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 10.1.12.1 
>(FastEthernet0/0) is resync: route configuration changed
>
>
>R2(config-router)#do sh ip ro eigrp | i D
>D*   0.0.0.0/0 [90/281600] via 10.1.12.1, 00:03:11, FastEthernet0/0
>R2(config-router)#
As you can see, that prefix list allows only the *exact* prefix 0.0.0.0/0, the 
default route. Other prefixes were not allowed, because none of them matched 
*exactly* 0.0.0.0 with a prefix length of 0.

Hope this helps.

When it doubt, lab it.

Best,
Bob


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, JM NGOK <[email protected]> wrote:

That's my concerns. I think this prefix-list is useless since it allows the 
default-route (which includes any route) . 
>
>Marko,
>
>Do you think this prefix-list is accurate for filtering ?
>
>
>Thanks
> 
>     Jean-Marie NGOK 
> Senior Network Engineer
>  
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Wilson Tuma <[email protected]>
>To: JM NGOK <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
><[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:22 AM
>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS]  Prefix-list doubt
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>Prefix List have always been tricky for me. But from my understanding.
>
> ip prefix-list ROUTES seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0  : Will permit only a default 
>route
>
>ip prefix-list ROUTES seq 999 deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 : Will deny anything.
>
>Combined it would mean permit default route and deny anything else.
>Which is as good as permitting only the default route Since everything else is 
>denied by the implied deny all at the end of the prefix-list.
>
>So the final thing should be.
>
>ip prefix-list ROUTES seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0
>
>
>HTH
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>Wilson F. Tuma
>====================================
>CCNP, CCNA, MCSE,  MCSA
>
>Box  1784 Douala
>Cell  : +237 77 753 753
>Email : [email protected]
>====================================
>
>
>________________________________
> From: JM NGOK <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 8:09 PM
>Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS]  Prefix-list doubt
>
>Hi all,
>
>Please excuse my foolishness but I want to understand which subnets are 
>allowed under this prefix-list: 
>
>
>ip prefix-list ROUTES description INBOUND-ROUTES 
>ip prefix-list ROUTES seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0
>ip prefix-list ROUTES seq 999 deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
> 
>Again excuse me if this is not a CCIE level question. I just have some doubts.
>
>Thanks
>
>     Jean-Marie NGOK 
> Senior Network Engineer
>        347 - 559 - 1172
>_______________________________________________
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>_______________________________________________
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to