Good it works .. that's what I thought. However failover should be pretty slow.
On Friday, October 12, 2012, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: > R6#clear ip bgp * > *Oct 9 20:02:15.263: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Idle to Active > *Oct 9 20:02:15.263: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open active, local address 10.0.46.6 > *Oct 9 20:02:15.267: BGP: 10.0.46.55 read request no-op > *Oct 9 20:02:15.267: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open failed: Connection refused by remote host, open active delaye d 3419ms (5000ms max, 90% jitter) > R6# > *Oct 9 20:02:18.523: BGPNSF state: 10.0.46.55 went from nsf_not_active to nsf_not_active > *Oct 9 20:02:18.523: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Active to Idle > *Oct 9 20:02:20.383: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Idle to Active > *Oct 9 20:02:20.383: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open active, local address 10.0.46.6 > *Oct 9 20:02:20.387: BGP: 10.0.46.55 read request no-op > *Oct 9 20:02:20.387: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open failed: Connection refused by remote host, open active delaye d 1804ms (5000ms max, 90% jitter) > *Oct 9 20:02:22.191: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open active, local address 10.0.46.6 > *Oct 9 20:02:22.191: BGP: 10.0.46.55 read request no-op > *Oct 9 20:02:22.195: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open failed: Connection refused by remote host, open active delaye d 6480ms (10000ms max, 60% jitter) > *Oct 9 20:02:28.367: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.1.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.2.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.3.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.4.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.5.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.6.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.7.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.8.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.9.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.10.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.11.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.12.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.13.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.14.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.371: BGP: Applying map to find origin for 192.46.15.0/24 > *Oct 9 20:02:28.675: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open active, local address 10.0.46.6 LOL > *Oct 9 20:02:28.675: BGP: 10.0.46.55 read request no-op > *Oct 9 20:02:28.679: BGP: 10.0.46.55 open failed: Connection refused by remote host, open active delaye d 18082ms (20000ms max, 60% jitter) > *Oct 9 20:02:40.635: BGP: 10.0.46.55 passive open to 10.0.46.1 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.635: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Active to Idle > *Oct 9 20:02:40.635: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Idle to Connect > *Oct 9 20:02:40.635: BGP: 10.0.46.55 read request no-op > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 34 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 180 seconds > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from Connect to OpenSent > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 456, holdtime 180 seconds > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 24 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 6 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 1, length 4 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has MP_EXT CAP for afi/safi: 1/1 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 2 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 128, length 0 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH capability(old) for all address-families > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 2 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 2, length 0 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH capability(new) for all address-families > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 6 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 65, length 4 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 OPEN has 4-byte ASN CAP for: 456 > BGP: 10.0.46.55 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 456, 4-byte remote AS 456 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.639: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm > *Oct 9 20:02:40.643: BGP: 10.0.46.55 send message type 1, length (incl. header) 53 > *Oct 9 20:02:40.651: BGP: 10.0.46.55 went from OpenConfirm to Established > *Oct 9 20:02:40.651: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.46.55 Up > > > very interesting indeed........ > > ________________________________ > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> > Cc: Tony Singh <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" < [email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:18 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP virtual IP ? > > > Here's someone from Cisco agreeing that it works but pointing out one of the issues mentioned earlier, that the routers doing HSRP wouldn't be able to initiate the BGP open: > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/200104 > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On Oct 11, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There has to be instability issues, right? Flapping, arps and macs getting hosed perhaps? >> >> >>*Paging Dr. Marko* >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: Tony Singh <[email protected]> >>To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> >>Cc: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" < [email protected]> >>Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:13 PM >>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP virtual IP ? >> >> >>Good work Nick >> >> >>I'm sure Cisco know this works..? Why do they not recommend it then ... >> >> >>-- >>BR >> >> >>Tony >> >>Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> >>On 11 Oct 2012, at 23:06, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>>R5(config-router)#do sh ip b >>>*Oct 11 22:09:20.495: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.46.1 Down User reset >>>*Oct 11 22:09:20.907: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 10.0.46.1 Up gp >>>BGP table version is 16, local router ID is 10.0.46.55 >>>Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, >>> r RIB-failure, S Stale >>>Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete >>> >>> >>> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path >>>*>i192.46.1.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.2.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.3.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.4.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.5.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.6.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.7.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.8.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.9.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.10.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.11.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.12.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.13.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.14.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>*>i192.46.15.0 10.0.46.1 1234 100 10000 i >>>R5(config-router)# >>> >>> >>>i need a fast way to copy and paste prefixes in :) >>> >>> >>>I did manipulate weight, MED... >>> >>>________________________________ >>> From: Tony Singh <[email protected]> >>>To: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> >>>Cc: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" < [email protected]> >>>Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:54 PM >>>Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP virtual IP ? >>> >>>Take it further see how many prefixes it can handle, check metrics work weight local pref med... >>> >>>-- >>>BR >>> >>>Tony >>> >>>Sent from my iPad >>> >>>On 11 Oct 2012, at 22:34, Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I can't believe it, working on real hardware as well: >>>> >>>> interface FastEthernet0/0 >>>> ip address 10.0.46.6 255.255.255.0 >>>> duplex auto >>>> speed auto >>>> standby 0 ip 10.0.46.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> router bgp 456 >>>> no synchronization >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 10.0.46.55 remote-as 456 >>>> no auto-summary >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> interface FastEthernet0/0 >>>> ip address 10.0.46.55 > 255.255.255.0 >>>> duplex > auto >>>> speed auto >>>> >>>> >>>> router bgp 456 >>>> no synchronization >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 10.0.46.1 remote-as 456 >>>> no auto-summary >>>> >>>> >>>> R5(config-router)#do sh ip bgp sum >>>> BGP router identifier 10.0.46.55, local AS number 456 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd >>>> 10.0.46.1 4 456 5 5 1 0 0 00:03:18 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> R5(config-router)#do sh tcp brief >>>> TCB Local Address > Foreign Address (state) >>>> 66A1041C 10.0.46.55.39341 10.0.46.1.179 ESTAB >>>> >>>> >>>> System image file is "flash:c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> >>>> To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:51 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Hello team can we make bgp neighbor ship HSRP virtual IP ? >>>> >>>> Just what I need, another OCD day. Oh well, I'll be home in about 8 hours and will have access to real hardware. I will let everyone know what happens. >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Bob McCouch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Interesting. I was also pretty sure that didn't work. At best it would >>>>> only do a passive open (respond to a TCP syn) no originate the >>>>> session. >>>>> >>>>> Bob >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent > from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:25 AM, > Nick Bonifacio <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > -- Samir Idris _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
