ok ok, had to draw this out, man you can't beat a drawing a topology for understanding things.... jeez what is wrong me man!
basically we want as2004 to have less desirable FD then that of as6009 for any redistributed as1001 routes r2 mutual redistribution between as1001 & as2004 r6 mutual redistribution between as1001 & as6009 got it! sorry for spamming and such a basic question! > On 27 October 2012 01:10, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Ok sorry, just seen >> >> *Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 1308160, type external* >> >> so it is known via 1001 >> >> ok understand that we have mutual redistribution here... >> >> Redistributing via eigrp 2004, eigrp 1001 >> >> then why does it say >> * >> * >> * Advertised by eigrp 2004* >> >> ? is that because of "as well" >> >> >> On 27 October 2012 01:08, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> R2 mutual redistribution between AS1001 & AS2004 >>> >>> why would we not see the route from AS1001 ? >>> >>> R2#show ip eigrp top all-links | s 200.0.0.1 >>> P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 >>> via Redistributed (1308160/0) >>> P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 >>> via 150.100.12.1 (1308160/1280256), FastEthernet0/0 >>> via 150.100.100.5 (42306560/21794560), Serial0/2/1.256 >>> >>> >>> but we're seeing it from AS2004 instead ? >>> >>> R2#show ip route 200.0.0.1 >>> Routing entry for 200.0.0.1/32 >>> Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 1308160, type external >>> Redistributing via eigrp 2004, eigrp 1001 >>> * Advertised by eigrp 2004* >>> Last update from 150.100.12.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 01:02:53 ago >>> Routing Descriptor Blocks: >>> * 150.100.12.1, from 150.100.12.1, 01:02:53 ago, via FastEthernet0/0 >>> Route metric is 1308160, traffic share count is 1 >>> Total delay is 50100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit >>> Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes >>> Loading 1/255, Hops 1 >>> >>> >>> >>> route originates from external eigrp 170 with redistribution command >>> within the same autonomous system AS1001 (R1) >>> >>> >>> P 200.0.0.1/32, 1 successors, FD is 1308160, serno 5 >>> via Redistributed (1308160/*0)* >>> >>> >>> The advertised distance of* 0* indicates the raw route from R1 AS1001 >>> right? >>> >>> Then why is AS2004 preferred ? >>> >>> >>> router eigrp 2004 >>> redistribute eigrp 1001 >>> default-metric 1 1 1 1 1 >>> >>> router eigrp 1001 >>> redistribute eigrp 2004 >>> default-metric 1 1 1 1 1 >>> >>> >>> Am i missing something when it says advertised by * *eigrp 2004 ? >>> >>> >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 26 October 2012 23:49, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It says that AS6009 should be preferred, so >>>> >>>> r6 >>>> router eigrp 1001 >>>> redistribute eigrp 6009 >>>> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 >>>> >>>> router eigrp 6009 >>>> redistribute eigrp 1001 >>>> default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 >>>> >>>> so routes from r6's perspective from other connected As's see the route >>>> from 6009, is that it? >>>> >>>> example of r1's loopback >>>> >>>> R6#show ip route 200.0.0.1 >>>> Routing entry for 200.0.0.1/32 >>>> Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 41794560, type external >>>> Redistributing via eigrp 1001, eigrp 6009 >>>> *Advertised by eigrp 6009* >>>> Last update from 150.100.100.2 on Serial0/1/0, 00:18:52 ago >>>> Routing Descriptor Blocks: >>>> * 150.100.100.2, from 150.100.100.2, 00:18:52 ago, via Serial0/1/0 >>>> Route metric is 41794560, traffic share count is 1 >>>> Total delay is 70100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 64 Kbit >>>> Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes >>>> Loading 1/255, Hops 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> what about from other routers perspective? checked and they obv see >>>> best networks from their own AS >>>> >>>> this is expected i guess as they know not of other AS's tho those AS >>>> routes have been redistributed into their own AS1001 - but not 100% clear >>>> in DSG & video >>>> >>>> Sorry for being a thicko Marko but I don't see it as black and white! >>>> >>>> BR >>>> >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 October 2012 18:13, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> What did the video solution say? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Can anyone help on this please >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > BR >>>>> > >>>>> > Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>>>> > >>>>> > On 26 Oct 2012, at 03:07, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> in this task it asks that AS 6009 is preferred after all is said >>>>> and done, ok so we have a better seed metric on r6 for this for both eigrp >>>>> processes. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> now im getting confused on "where" exactly AS6009 should show up as >>>>> being preferred? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> thanks in advance >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Tony >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> > >>>>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> > >>>>> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
