Dnyaneshwar,
They are not contradictory. The first statement states for the same feature. In the last statement you have problems with two queuing mechanisms that don't play together. Traffic shaping and priority queuing are two separate features. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Cell: +1.248.504.7309 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dnyaneshwar Gore Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:31 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Global & Interface policy precedence Hi, I am referring to ASA ver 8.0 config guide. On page 16-23, it is mentioned that "Interface service policies take precedence over the global service policy for a given feature." But on page 25-5, they are saying "For example, if you configure standard priority queueing for the global policy, and then configure traffic shaping for a specific interface, the feature you configured last is rejected because the global policy overlaps the interface policy." Here contradictory explanation is given for interface policy and global policy implementation on interface. Kindly help me to understand this. Regards, D.M.Gore
