According to the proctor guide, both routers use a stateful-id of 1. The Addressing configuration guide is gray on whether this should be unique or not and even shows HSRP peers as having the identical config. If you look at the Cisco article below, it clearly states that they should be unique.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_white_paper09186a0080118b04.shtml *"Note: *Note the ID is different for the each router. Each SNAT router should have a unique ID number. " It also goes on to say "NAT entries have been extended to include information about which of the SNAT routers created them, and which router is responsible for the state and timing of that particular entry. The combination of the entry id-number and the SNAT router id-number make each entry unique within the group." The following document states that the "stateful id" is a "Unique number given to each router in the stateful translation group." I guess I am trying to understand the router's way of thinking. How can this work both ways?
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
